Oprah - Meghan Markle interview on Sunday March 7 - and Royal meltdown
//www.gstatic.com/images/branding/product/1x/groups_32dp.png
Baba Kadiri,

You have a problem, I know my British history fairly well. From 1066 – to 1485, the history of the British Empire during the reign of Queen Victoria, through both wars to the present day, and some of the literary output produced within that time frame. Don’t forget, Patrick White was Australian.

Much of what you call history is gossip. There’s much of the actual history of Sierra Leone, Ghana and Nigeria that has not yet surfaced in any of the history books and doctoral dissertations that have been written so far, and there are dossiers that probably never will see the light of day. How do I know? I know. Have I read all the history books and PhD dissertations and dossiers about say the last 65 years covering the history of Sierra Leone, Ghana, Nigeria or the last 80 years of Sweden for that matter? Of course not, but there are missing pieces which have been buried forever and which even Michael Crowder or Scott Thompson has not written about..

You are fond of referring to all kinds of people as “Goebbels” and “hogwash. I am not. When I said in ordinary Buckingham Palace English that Prince Charles had “more or less” abolished the title “Defender of Faith” I did not think that I was dogmatically stating a Gradgrindian fact, even if “DEFENDER OF FAITH” had originally been written in stone, like The TEN COMMANDMENTS. (And who among us mortals can change them? I mean the ten Commandments. More accurately, to satisfy the sophist in you I suppose that I should have said that dear Prince Charles had repudiated or was only proposing to repudiate that title (since he is not yet the reigning monarch who is the only one (according to you) who I suppose has the authority to do so – whether or not to be ratified by an act of Parliament, I don’t know. What I do know is that Dear Prince Charles did make that radical proposal “ Defender of Faith” which caused quite a stir at the time when said that, and this happened shortly either before or after his famous Oxford lecture on Islam which also caused quite a stir, to the extent that some of his subjects far and wide were wondering if he had become a Muslim or acovert Muslim. Fact is, that he recanted the idea of “Defender of Faith” and reverted to the old order formula, “Defender of THE FAITH” once again, as is clear from a cursory search on the world wide web. (Certain very contemporary types of news/ gossips get into the history books a little later, when historians and gossip mongers write about them ( current, contemporary news items) in the past tense. For instance in the past few years I have followed this running commentary Porter's Pensées ( by history Professor Bernard Porter, although I don’t see eye to eye with all his socialistic views about everything and his crusade against Boris Johnson ( You could take as look at what he has to say about the Meghan – Harry affair)

If what you have set out to do is to correct my opinions, whilst you are at it for your own edification you had better look up the meaning of these three words:

dull

boorish

boring

YOU “just can't see any connection” where I see connections because we see things differently. Your parochial and literary mind is certainly a different wind-angled mind from mine as you have just admitted, and mine is also different from yours, through no fault of mine. Remember now, it was King Solomon who said I’m Black and beautiful in Chapter 1 verse 5 of his Song of Songs, long before Christopher Columbus discovered America or James Brown started doing the Bugaboo and the Mashed Potato.

I have no intention to discuss any Hebrew or Arabic meanings of Adam, I don’t know how you got your education about that kind of discussion – and I’m not about to engage your superior Rabbinic understandings because, there are certain things I don’t waste my time discussing with just everybody, especially not an ignoramus like me. I know no Yoruba, talk less about gematria or the allusive poetry of your chimpanzee.

In response to your your long-winded third paragraph, I’ll be brief and just say this:

Harry tasted Meghan’s Black Magic – she gave him The Royal Treatment. Baba Kadiri, I’m sure that you must have received or been subjected to THE ROYAL TREATMENT?

Harry sang Purple Haze! He moaned. He must have told William, “Whatever it is, that girl put a spell on me!”

The rest is history.

If you are feeling studious you can as you say read all about it. All you’ve got to do is take your own advice: “ The history of British Monarchy preceded the advent of internet and facts contained in history books may not be found in the Google or Wikipedia. For the intellectually lazy, internet can be a short way of acquiring partial knowledge while for the intellectually active, internet is a complement to reading books. As I will show later, even what is found in the Google can be falsified or be distorted intentionally by a Googler to tally with the opinion of the Googler self” (The Bible According to Baba Kadiri )

Harry and Meghan were not specific about who said what about the colour of their yet unborn baby. Maybe you should check out the meaning of the word “Specific” Lie detector tests are not that reliable either.

Since Buckingham Palace issued this statement on the allegations of racism how can you in good conscience say that “ Since silence is consent, the silence of the Royal Family over the racist attack on Harry and Meghan remains true.”?

You should be ashamed of yourself gleefully spreading all kinds of salacious, mischievous and malicious reports about other people’s private lives….

I was just getting down to a very personal response to Oga Falola's Conversation with Bishop Kukah when I noticed that Baba Kadiri was on the warpath once again and that this time it was me for whom the bell is tolling.

As Slick Willy once famously said, “I'm going to say this again: I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Miss Lewinsky. I never told anybody to lie, not a single time; never. These allegations are false. And I need to go back to work for the American people.”, so Cornelius Ignoramus now says, please Baba Kadiri, let me get back to listening carefully to Alagba Falola and Bishop Kukah of Sokoto., so that I will know what I’m responding to...