golden-section search fails when upper and lower bounds are equal
**Describe the bug**
I was using pvlib for sometime now and until now I was always passing a big dataframe containing readings of a long period. Because of some changes in our software architecture, I need to pass the weather readings as a single reading (a dataframe with only one row) and I noticed that for readings that GHI-DHI are zero pvlib fails to calculate the output and returns below error while the same code executes correctly with weather information that has non-zero GHI-DHI:
```python
import os
import pathlib
import time
import json
from datetime import datetime
from time import mktime, gmtime

import pandas as pd

from pvlib import pvsystem
from pvlib import location as pvlocation
from pvlib import modelchain
from pvlib.temperature import TEMPERATURE_MODEL_PARAMETERS as PARAMS # not used -- to remove
from pvlib.bifacial.pvfactors import pvfactors_timeseries
from pvlib.temperature import TEMPERATURE_MODEL_PARAMETERS

class PV:
    def pv_transform_time(self, val):
        # tt = gmtime(val / 1000)
        tt = gmtime(val)
        dd = datetime.fromtimestamp(mktime(tt))
        timestamp = pd.Timestamp(dd)
        return timestamp

    def __init__(self, model: str, inverter: str, latitude: float, longitude: float, **kwargs):
        # super().__init__(**kwargs)

        temperature_model_parameters = TEMPERATURE_MODEL_PARAMETERS["sapm"][
            "open_rack_glass_glass"
        ]
        # Load the database of CEC module model parameters
        modules = pvsystem.retrieve_sam("cecmod")
        # Load the database of CEC inverter model parameters
        inverters = pvsystem.retrieve_sam("cecinverter")


        # A bare bone PV simulator

        # Load the database of CEC module model parameters
        modules = pvsystem.retrieve_sam('cecmod')
        inverters = pvsystem.retrieve_sam('cecinverter')
        module_parameters = modules[model]
        inverter_parameters = inverters[inverter]

        location = pvlocation.Location(latitude=latitude, longitude=longitude)
        system = pvsystem.PVSystem(module_parameters=module_parameters, inverter_parameters=inverter_parameters, temperature_model_parameters=temperature_model_parameters)
        self.modelchain = modelchain.ModelChain(system, location, aoi_model='no_loss', spectral_model="no_loss")

    def process(self, data):
        weather = pd.read_json(data)
        # print(f"raw_weather: {weather}")
        weather.drop('time.1', axis=1, inplace=True)
        weather['time'] = pd.to_datetime(weather['time']).map(datetime.timestamp) # --> this works for the new process_weather code and also the old weather file
        weather["time"] = weather["time"].apply(self.pv_transform_time)
        weather.index = weather["time"]
        # print(f"weather: {weather}")
        # print(weather.dtypes)
        # print(weather['ghi'][0])
        # print(type(weather['ghi'][0]))

        # simulate
        self.modelchain.run_model(weather)
        # print(self.modelchain.results.ac.to_frame().to_json())
        print(self.modelchain.results.ac)


# good data
good_data = "{\"time\":{\"12\":\"2010-01-01 13:30:00+00:00\"},\"ghi\":{\"12\":36},\"dhi\":{\"12\":36},\"dni\":{\"12\":0},\"Tamb\":{\"12\":8.0},\"WindVel\":{\"12\":5.0},\"WindDir\":{\"12\":270},\"time.1\":{\"12\":\"2010-01-01 13:30:00+00:00\"}}"

# data that causes error
data = "{\"time\":{\"4\":\"2010-01-01 05:30:00+00:00\"},\"ghi\":{\"4\":0},\"dhi\":{\"4\":0},\"dni\":{\"4\":0},\"Tamb\":{\"4\":8.0},\"WindVel\":{\"4\":4.0},\"WindDir\":{\"4\":240},\"time.1\":{\"4\":\"2010-01-01 05:30:00+00:00\"}}"
p1 = PV(model="Trina_Solar_TSM_300DEG5C_07_II_", inverter="ABB__MICRO_0_25_I_OUTD_US_208__208V_", latitude=51.204483, longitude=5.265472)
p1.process(good_data)
print("=====")
p1.process(data)
```
Error:
```log
$ python3 ./tmp-pv.py 
time
2010-01-01 13:30:00    7.825527
dtype: float64
=====
/home/user/.local/lib/python3.10/site-packages/pvlib/tools.py:340: RuntimeWarning: divide by zero encountered in divide
  np.trunc(np.log(atol / (df['VH'] - df['VL'])) / np.log(phim1)))
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/user/workspace/enorch/simulator/simulator_processor/src/pv/./tmp-pv.py", line 88, in <module>
    p1.process(data)
  File "/home/user/workspace/enorch/simulator/simulator_processor/src/pv/./tmp-pv.py", line 75, in process
    self.modelchain.run_model(weather)
  File "/home/user/.local/lib/python3.10/site-packages/pvlib/modelchain.py", line 1770, in run_model
    self._run_from_effective_irrad(weather)
  File "/home/user/.local/lib/python3.10/site-packages/pvlib/modelchain.py", line 1858, in _run_from_effective_irrad
    self.dc_model()
  File "/home/user/.local/lib/python3.10/site-packages/pvlib/modelchain.py", line 790, in cec
    return self._singlediode(self.system.calcparams_cec)
  File "/home/user/.local/lib/python3.10/site-packages/pvlib/modelchain.py", line 772, in _singlediode
    self.results.dc = tuple(itertools.starmap(
  File "/home/user/.local/lib/python3.10/site-packages/pvlib/pvsystem.py", line 931, in singlediode
    return singlediode(photocurrent, saturation_current,
  File "/home/user/.local/lib/python3.10/site-packages/pvlib/pvsystem.py", line 2826, in singlediode
    out = _singlediode._lambertw(
  File "/home/user/.local/lib/python3.10/site-packages/pvlib/singlediode.py", line 651, in _lambertw
    p_mp, v_mp = _golden_sect_DataFrame(params, 0., v_oc * 1.14,
  File "/home/user/.local/lib/python3.10/site-packages/pvlib/tools.py", line 364, in _golden_sect_DataFrame
    raise Exception("Iterations exceeded maximum. Check that func",
Exception: ('Iterations exceeded maximum. Check that func', ' is not NaN in (lower, upper)')
```

I have to mention that for now the workaround that I am using is to pass the weather data as a dataframe with two rows, the first row is a good weather data that pvlib can process and the second row is the incoming weather reading (I can also post that code if you want).

**Expected behavior**
PVlib should have consistent behavior and regardless of GHI-DHI readings.

**Versions:**
```python
>>> import pvlib
>>> import pandas
>>> pvlib.__version__
'0.9.1'
>>> pandas.__version__
'1.4.3'
``` 
 - python: 3.10.6
- OS: Ubuntu 22.04.1 LTS

["pvlib/tests/test_tools.py::test__golden_sect_DataFrame_vector"]
["pvlib/tests/test_tools.py::test_build_kwargs[keys0-input_dict0-expected0]", "pvlib/tests/test_tools.py::test_build_kwargs[keys1-input_dict1-expected1]", "pvlib/tests/test_tools.py::test_build_kwargs[keys2-input_dict2-expected2]", "pvlib/tests/test_tools.py::test_build_kwargs[keys3-input_dict3-expected3]", "pvlib/tests/test_tools.py::test__golden_sect_DataFrame[params0-0.0-1.0-0.5-_obj_test_golden_sect]", "pvlib/tests/test_tools.py::test__golden_sect_DataFrame[params1-0.0-1.0-0.07230200263994839-_obj_test_golden_sect]", "pvlib/tests/test_tools.py::test__golden_sect_DataFrame[params2-0.0-100.0-89.14332727531685-_obj_test_golden_sect]", "pvlib/tests/test_tools.py::test__golden_sect_DataFrame_atol", "pvlib/tests/test_tools.py::test__golden_sect_DataFrame_nans", "pvlib/tests/test_tools.py::test_degrees_to_index_1"]
c78b50f4337ecbe536a961336ca91a1176efc0e8
2022-12-07T21:12:08Z
ef8ad2fee9840a77d14b0dfd17fc489dd85c9b91
Confirmed. This appears to be an oversight in `pvlib.tools._golden_section_DataFrame` involving error messaging, likely introduced with #1089 .

In this code when processing the content of `data`, photocurrent is 0., hence the shunt resistance is infinite and v_oc is 0. That sets the range for the golden section search to be [0., 0.]. [iterlimit](https://github.com/pvlib/pvlib-python/blob/582b956c63c463e5178fbb7a88fa545fa5b1c257/pvlib/tools.py#L358) is then -infinity, which skips the loop (`iterations <= iterlimit`) but since `iterations > iterlimit` raises the "Iterations exceeded..." exception.

pvlib__pvlib-python-1606
diff --git a/pvlib/tools.py b/pvlib/tools.py
--- a/pvlib/tools.py
+++ b/pvlib/tools.py
@@ -341,6 +341,8 @@ def _golden_sect_DataFrame(params, lower, upper, func, atol=1e-8):
     --------
     pvlib.singlediode._pwr_optfcn
     """
+    if np.any(upper - lower < 0.):
+        raise ValueError('upper >= lower is required')
 
     phim1 = (np.sqrt(5) - 1) / 2
 
@@ -349,16 +351,8 @@ def _golden_sect_DataFrame(params, lower, upper, func, atol=1e-8):
     df['VL'] = lower
 
     converged = False
-    iterations = 0
 
-    # handle all NaN case gracefully
-    with warnings.catch_warnings():
-        warnings.filterwarnings(action='ignore',
-                                message='All-NaN slice encountered')
-        iterlimit = 1 + np.nanmax(
-            np.trunc(np.log(atol / (df['VH'] - df['VL'])) / np.log(phim1)))
-
-    while not converged and (iterations <= iterlimit):
+    while not converged:
 
         phi = phim1 * (df['VH'] - df['VL'])
         df['V1'] = df['VL'] + phi
@@ -373,22 +367,16 @@ def _golden_sect_DataFrame(params, lower, upper, func, atol=1e-8):
 
         err = abs(df['V2'] - df['V1'])
 
-        # works with single value because err is np.float64
-        converged = (err[~np.isnan(err)] < atol).all()
-        # err will be less than atol before iterations hit the limit
-        # but just to be safe
-        iterations += 1
-
-    if iterations > iterlimit:
-        raise Exception("Iterations exceeded maximum. Check that func",
-                        " is not NaN in (lower, upper)")  # pragma: no cover
+        # handle all NaN case gracefully
+        with warnings.catch_warnings():
+            warnings.filterwarnings(action='ignore',
+                                    message='All-NaN slice encountered')
+            converged = np.all(err[~np.isnan(err)] < atol)
 
-    try:
-        func_result = func(df, 'V1')
-        x = np.where(np.isnan(func_result), np.nan, df['V1'])
-    except KeyError:
-        func_result = np.full_like(upper, np.nan)
-        x = func_result.copy()
+    # best estimate of location of maximum
+    df['max'] = 0.5 * (df['V1'] + df['V2'])
+    func_result = func(df, 'max')
+    x = np.where(np.isnan(func_result), np.nan, df['max'])
 
     return func_result, x
 

golden-section search fails when upper and lower bounds are equal
**Describe the bug**
I was using pvlib for sometime now and until now I was always passing a big dataframe containing readings of a long period. Because of some changes in our software architecture, I need to pass the weather readings as a single reading (a dataframe with only one row) and I noticed that for readings that GHI-DHI are zero pvlib fails to calculate the output and returns below error while the same code executes correctly with weather information that has non-zero GHI-DHI:
```python
import os
import pathlib
import time
import json
from datetime import datetime
from time import mktime, gmtime

import pandas as pd

from pvlib import pvsystem
from pvlib import location as pvlocation
from pvlib import modelchain
from pvlib.temperature import TEMPERATURE_MODEL_PARAMETERS as PARAMS # not used -- to remove
from pvlib.bifacial.pvfactors import pvfactors_timeseries
from pvlib.temperature import TEMPERATURE_MODEL_PARAMETERS

class PV:
    def pv_transform_time(self, val):
        # tt = gmtime(val / 1000)
        tt = gmtime(val)
        dd = datetime.fromtimestamp(mktime(tt))
        timestamp = pd.Timestamp(dd)
        return timestamp

    def __init__(self, model: str, inverter: str, latitude: float, longitude: float, **kwargs):
        # super().__init__(**kwargs)

        temperature_model_parameters = TEMPERATURE_MODEL_PARAMETERS["sapm"][
            "open_rack_glass_glass"
        ]
        # Load the database of CEC module model parameters
        modules = pvsystem.retrieve_sam("cecmod")
        # Load the database of CEC inverter model parameters
        inverters = pvsystem.retrieve_sam("cecinverter")


        # A bare bone PV simulator

        # Load the database of CEC module model parameters
        modules = pvsystem.retrieve_sam('cecmod')
        inverters = pvsystem.retrieve_sam('cecinverter')
        module_parameters = modules[model]
        inverter_parameters = inverters[inverter]

        location = pvlocation.Location(latitude=latitude, longitude=longitude)
        system = pvsystem.PVSystem(module_parameters=module_parameters, inverter_parameters=inverter_parameters, temperature_model_parameters=temperature_model_parameters)
        self.modelchain = modelchain.ModelChain(system, location, aoi_model='no_loss', spectral_model="no_loss")

    def process(self, data):
        weather = pd.read_json(data)
        # print(f"raw_weather: {weather}")
        weather.drop('time.1', axis=1, inplace=True)
        weather['time'] = pd.to_datetime(weather['time']).map(datetime.timestamp) # --> this works for the new process_weather code and also the old weather file
        weather["time"] = weather["time"].apply(self.pv_transform_time)
        weather.index = weather["time"]
        # print(f"weather: {weather}")
        # print(weather.dtypes)
        # print(weather['ghi'][0])
        # print(type(weather['ghi'][0]))

        # simulate
        self.modelchain.run_model(weather)
        # print(self.modelchain.results.ac.to_frame().to_json())
        print(self.modelchain.results.ac)


# good data
good_data = "{\"time\":{\"12\":\"2010-01-01 13:30:00+00:00\"},\"ghi\":{\"12\":36},\"dhi\":{\"12\":36},\"dni\":{\"12\":0},\"Tamb\":{\"12\":8.0},\"WindVel\":{\"12\":5.0},\"WindDir\":{\"12\":270},\"time.1\":{\"12\":\"2010-01-01 13:30:00+00:00\"}}"

# data that causes error
data = "{\"time\":{\"4\":\"2010-01-01 05:30:00+00:00\"},\"ghi\":{\"4\":0},\"dhi\":{\"4\":0},\"dni\":{\"4\":0},\"Tamb\":{\"4\":8.0},\"WindVel\":{\"4\":4.0},\"WindDir\":{\"4\":240},\"time.1\":{\"4\":\"2010-01-01 05:30:00+00:00\"}}"
p1 = PV(model="Trina_Solar_TSM_300DEG5C_07_II_", inverter="ABB__MICRO_0_25_I_OUTD_US_208__208V_", latitude=51.204483, longitude=5.265472)
p1.process(good_data)
print("=====")
p1.process(data)
```
Error:
```log
$ python3 ./tmp-pv.py 
time
2010-01-01 13:30:00    7.825527
dtype: float64
=====
/home/user/.local/lib/python3.10/site-packages/pvlib/tools.py:340: RuntimeWarning: divide by zero encountered in divide
  np.trunc(np.log(atol / (df['VH'] - df['VL'])) / np.log(phim1)))
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/user/workspace/enorch/simulator/simulator_processor/src/pv/./tmp-pv.py", line 88, in <module>
    p1.process(data)
  File "/home/user/workspace/enorch/simulator/simulator_processor/src/pv/./tmp-pv.py", line 75, in process
    self.modelchain.run_model(weather)
  File "/home/user/.local/lib/python3.10/site-packages/pvlib/modelchain.py", line 1770, in run_model
    self._run_from_effective_irrad(weather)
  File "/home/user/.local/lib/python3.10/site-packages/pvlib/modelchain.py", line 1858, in _run_from_effective_irrad
    self.dc_model()
  File "/home/user/.local/lib/python3.10/site-packages/pvlib/modelchain.py", line 790, in cec
    return self._singlediode(self.system.calcparams_cec)
  File "/home/user/.local/lib/python3.10/site-packages/pvlib/modelchain.py", line 772, in _singlediode
    self.results.dc = tuple(itertools.starmap(
  File "/home/user/.local/lib/python3.10/site-packages/pvlib/pvsystem.py", line 931, in singlediode
    return singlediode(photocurrent, saturation_current,
  File "/home/user/.local/lib/python3.10/site-packages/pvlib/pvsystem.py", line 2826, in singlediode
    out = _singlediode._lambertw(
  File "/home/user/.local/lib/python3.10/site-packages/pvlib/singlediode.py", line 651, in _lambertw
    p_mp, v_mp = _golden_sect_DataFrame(params, 0., v_oc * 1.14,
  File "/home/user/.local/lib/python3.10/site-packages/pvlib/tools.py", line 364, in _golden_sect_DataFrame
    raise Exception("Iterations exceeded maximum. Check that func",
Exception: ('Iterations exceeded maximum. Check that func', ' is not NaN in (lower, upper)')
```

I have to mention that for now the workaround that I am using is to pass the weather data as a dataframe with two rows, the first row is a good weather data that pvlib can process and the second row is the incoming weather reading (I can also post that code if you want).

**Expected behavior**
PVlib should have consistent behavior and regardless of GHI-DHI readings.

**Versions:**
```python
>>> import pvlib
>>> import pandas
>>> pvlib.__version__
'0.9.1'
>>> pandas.__version__
'1.4.3'
``` 
 - python: 3.10.6
- OS: Ubuntu 22.04.1 LTS

pvlib/pvlib-python
diff --git a/pvlib/tests/test_tools.py b/pvlib/tests/test_tools.py
--- a/pvlib/tests/test_tools.py
+++ b/pvlib/tests/test_tools.py
@@ -45,6 +45,22 @@ def test__golden_sect_DataFrame_vector():
     v, x = tools._golden_sect_DataFrame(params, lower, upper,
                                         _obj_test_golden_sect)
     assert np.allclose(x, expected, atol=1e-8)
+    # some upper and lower bounds equal
+    params = {'c': np.array([1., 2., 1.]), 'n': np.array([1., 1., 1.])}
+    lower = np.array([0., 0.001, 1.])
+    upper = np.array([1., 1.2, 1.])
+    expected = np.array([0.5, 0.25, 1.0])  # x values for maxima
+    v, x = tools._golden_sect_DataFrame(params, lower, upper,
+                                        _obj_test_golden_sect)
+    assert np.allclose(x, expected, atol=1e-8)
+    # all upper and lower bounds equal, arrays of length 1
+    params = {'c': np.array([1.]), 'n': np.array([1.])}
+    lower = np.array([1.])
+    upper = np.array([1.])
+    expected = np.array([1.])  # x values for maxima
+    v, x = tools._golden_sect_DataFrame(params, lower, upper,
+                                        _obj_test_golden_sect)
+    assert np.allclose(x, expected, atol=1e-8)
 
 
 def test__golden_sect_DataFrame_nans():

0.8