[07:46] <zniavre> good morning
[07:47] <zniavre> there is a way to "blacklist" flash pluggin  in web-browser when using rgba module?
[07:48] <zniavre> i managed to theme chrome-browser but flash (video) can't work > http://i.imgur.com/Zq8EU.png
[09:36] <thorwil> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/59920583/ubuntu_com_vs_uds_ubuntu_com_zoom.png
[17:33] <thorwil> vish: got a favorite in http://www.flickr.com/groups/uawt-1/pool/ ?
[17:34] <vish> thorwil: i havent looked there..
[17:34] <vish> thorwil: fav for?
[17:34] <vish> oh the logo
[17:34] <vish> heh, i saw flickr and thought wallpapers :p
[17:35] <vish> thorwil: though this is a mod of CoF , i liked this one : http://wiki.ubuntu-br.org/TimeArtwork#head-cdff2bf16ee7854db58cf2519dc2b1c99af15a90
[17:36] <vish> the white and orange
[17:37] <thorwil> a whooping 2 wallpapers in the xubuntu pool, and both nail it. "it" being what the spec was meant to discourage
[17:38] <thorwil> vish: if you prefer that one over everything in the pool, i shouldn't have asked you ;p
[17:38] <vish> thorwil: well, everything is the pool is too noisy
[17:39] <vish> too busy..
[17:39] <vish> and very unrecognizable when they scale down
[17:46] <thorwil> well, it's tough
[17:47] <coz_> are these the bug squad logos?
[17:49] <thorwil> coz_: that's about the most disastrous and utterly destroying critique you can deliver
[17:49] <coz_> oh?
[17:50] <coz_> thorwil,  I have no idea what you mean
[17:50] <thorwil> coz_: those are proposals for the artwork team logo
[17:51] <thorwil> coz_: they might be bad, but the presence of brushes, pencils and such and the absence of bugs should have made it clear enough
[17:52] <coz_> thorwil,  still not clear... I just arrived and was wondering if that was what you guys were talking about
[17:52] <thorwil> coz_: if you just asked without looking, i have to take that back
[17:52] <coz_> ok
[17:52] <coz_> i dont have scroll back for that last hour
[17:54] <thorwil> the link http://www.flickr.com/groups/uawt-1/pool/ 20 minutes ago would have done
[17:54] <coz_> thorwil,  ah!!   definitly not the bug logos :)
[17:54] <thorwil> phew :)
[17:54] <coz_> :)
[17:55] <coz_> well now I can understand that these would difficult to make out scaled down ...yes?
[17:57] <thorwil> yeah, but if you scale down all that much, only simple geometry survives, anyway
[17:57] <thorwil> dinner, bbl
[19:21] <christhecoolboy> Hello Islington :)
[19:46] <thorwil> must-see video about logo creation: http://www.logodesignlove.com/logonom
[19:51] <woutervddn> any of have an idea about how to make a youtube video work in fullscreen (when using 2 monitors)
[19:51] <woutervddn> it allways shows the vid over 2 screens..  I got an Idea... Can I PM you?
[20:27] <Islington> christhecoolboy: sure
[20:27] <Islington> thorwil: harder but doable, I will try it
[20:28] <thorwil> Islington: makes it easier to stay away from twitter bird artwork :)
[20:29] <Islington> hah, didn't think about tat
[20:29] <Islington> *that
[20:30] <thorwil> a swallow would be a good fit for lubuntu. at least i guess the logo is supposed to be a swallow. i used to wonder if that is an alien spacecraft from babylon 5, or a messed up hand
[20:31] <Islington> its that what that is?


[15:30] <sil2100> Hey!
[15:30] <sil2100> I'm using the LP API to fetch some info about packages and I noticed something really strange in what I get back from LP
[15:31] <sil2100> For instance, an exemplary code-snippet that I used in lp-shell:
[15:31] <sil2100> http://paste.ubuntu.com/10707382/
[15:31] <sil2100> I tried getting all versions of the bash package and tried sorting it by when it was created in the archive
[15:32] <sil2100> Anyway, what worries me the most is that the latest created version seems to be 0.2.0-1build1, which is really old and not even visible in LP, and it's Published
[15:33] <sil2100> While the actual version, 4.3-11ubuntu2, is somewhere later
[15:33] <sil2100> Is that expected? Since I querried for packages from the vivid series I would expect seeing only those that I actually see in https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/vivid/+source/bash, for instance
[15:34] <sil2100> And I'm pretty sure 0.2.0-1build1 wasn't created at the beginning of this month
[15:49] <sil2100> AH!
[15:49] <sil2100> I see the problem
[15:49] <sil2100> exact_match is not True by default
[15:49] <sil2100> hah
[15:49] <sil2100> Scratch the above question, didn't know about this
[16:06] <cjwatson> sil2100: Yup, that's really a historical mistake in the API design.