[00:08] <jbalonso1> Anyone here know how to increase the available filehandles for upstart itself?
[00:08] <jbalonso1> (I'm running on Ubuntu Raring)
[00:09] <jbalonso1> I have a great number of jobs I'm trying to manage with upstart, and I've found that upstart is losing file handles to (rather useful) log files. When init runs out, /sbin/init spins at 100% and is unresponsive.
[16:11] <jackhill> Hi, I have a service that I am trying to write a configuration for.
[16:16] <jackhill> However, it doesn't behave correctly if I use expect fork or expect daemon. The PID reported by upstart is different than what I observer the service to be running as in ps.
[16:16] <jackhill> Also, a symptom of this is that I can't get upstart to stop the service.
[16:16] <jackhill> It works "correctly" if I tell the service to run in the foreground and omit the expect directive.
[16:17] <jackhill> My question is: is there a tool see if a service forks or double forks or does something else weird?
[16:20] <jackhill> Oh, it seems that, occording to the cookbook, there is no ill effect to just running the service in the foreground, so I'll just do that. :)
[18:58] <dylukes> Hey guys, I'm in a bit of a pickle.
[18:58] <dylukes> I have an upstart conf running `exec gunicorn...` inside a script stanza
[18:58] <dylukes> and a bunch of env variables declared outside
[18:59] <dylukes> I want those variables to be visible inside the exec. Is there any way to do this? Alternatively I can have the same variables in a .env file, but I can't figure out how to exec that file and have those visible to the exec'd gunicorn task
[19:04] <dylukes> hm, now they seem to work
[19:33] <dylukes> ah, no they aren't :p
[21:37] <jbalonso1> dylukes: Did you export your env variables prior to the exec?


 Hi
 Is it ok to upgrad to plasma 5.25
 lo7k
 Hello
[09:28] <Guest2> hello
 You are bot? (re @IrcsomeBot: <Guest2> hello)
[09:29] <Guest2> :)
[09:29] <Guest2> no
[09:30] <Guest2> I not bot
 Hmm, that's what I would say if I was a bot :p
 Any answer? (re @Omar: Is it ok to upgrad to plasma 5.25)
 Is it save to upgrad to plasma 5.25
[09:59] <oerheks> Omar how would you upgrade?
[10:00] <oerheks> via PPA ? use at your own risk https://kubuntu.org/news/plasma-5-25-for-jammy-22-04-available-via-ppa/
 So it is not 100% save yet? (re @IrcsomeBot: <oerheks> via PPA ? use at your own risk https://kubuntu.org/news/plasma-5-25-for-jammy-22-04-available-via-ppa/)
[10:01] <oerheks> Kubuntu team does its best, nobody can give 100% guarantee
[10:01] <oerheks> have fun with it!
 Ok thank you
 Can i ask here something to the topic from ubuntu studio? I m not on the notebook yet so i cant text in the irc
 My question is, when i put ubuntu studio into the normal kubuntu via ubuntu studio installer, are there any upgrades atm?
 For kernel and software? My notebook is really hood for music production so i need the newest software for it. Woth windows 11 its not as good as with linux
 6FCR
 0YP8
[20:59] <fatima> hello
[21:02] <g1tomer> Hello
[21:05] <g1tomer> anyone here
[21:05] <g1tomer> ?
 Hello is here help, for sddm and kde bugs?


[08:38] <JamesTait> Good morning all, happy Dance Like A Chicken Day! :-D http://youtu.be/9aKd_vQTwpw
[20:02] <beuno> soren, care to join #ubuntuone?  chaselivingston
[20:02] <beuno> er, IRC fail
[20:02] <beuno> chaselivingston, you around?   :)
[20:03] <beuno> anyone else from support?
[20:03] <soren> Ahoy.
[20:04] <beuno> soren, trying to track someone down
[20:04] <chaselivingston> beuno: here
[20:04] <beuno> aha!
[20:04] <beuno> chaselivingston, hi!
[20:04] <chaselivingston> beuno: hi!
[20:04] <beuno> soren here lost his 2fa devices
[20:04] <soren> I've flashed my phone and apparently clicked my yubikey too many times. So both my devices are useless.
[20:04] <chaselivingston> beuno: ah, toykeeper would be best for that
[20:04] <soren> I still have a session open with Launchpad itself, but login.launchpad.net asks me to authenticate.
[20:06] <soren> ...and I'm guessing I need an open session with login.l.n to manage my 2fa stuff?
[20:06] <beuno> soren, you won't be able to reset 2fa without 2fa, of course  :)
[20:07] <chaselivingston> soren: meet ToyKeeper
[20:07] <soren> ToyKeeper: Greetings.
[20:07] <chaselivingston> ToyKeeper: soren needs 2fa help
[20:07] <soren> 20:04 < soren> I've flashed my phone and apparently clicked my yubikey too many times. So both my devices are useless.
[20:07] <ToyKeeper> soren: email?
[20:07] <soren><EMAIL_ADDRESS>[20:40] <soren> beuno, chaselivingston: All sorted. Thanks, guys.
[20:43] <beuno> soren, np
[22:20] <facundobatista> dobey, ralsina, I just upgraded from Q to R, and was bite by this bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntuone-client/+bug/1093111
[22:20] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 1093111 in Arch Linux "Sync Daemon UnpicklingError" [Undecided,New]
[22:20] <facundobatista> verterok, ^
[22:21] <facundobatista> dobey, ralsina, I mean: I don't have installed the fix for the bug
[22:22] <facundobatista> dobey, ralsina, this is very strange:
[22:22] <facundobatista> ~$ apt-cache policy ubuntuone-client
[22:22] <facundobatista> ubuntuone-client:
[22:22] <facundobatista>   Instalados: 4.3+r1361-70~precise1
[22:22] <facundobatista>   Candidato:  4.3+r1361-70~precise1
[22:22] <facundobatista>   Tabla de versión:
[22:22] <facundobatista>  *** 4.3+r1361-70~precise1 0
[22:22] <facundobatista>         100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
[22:22] <facundobatista>      4.2.0-0ubuntu1 0
[22:22] <facundobatista>         500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ raring/main i386 Packages
[22:28] <dobey> facundobatista: you upgraded through without having the latest nightly version installed, but with an older nightly version that is still "newer" than the current stable version. re-enable nightlies ppa and upgrade, or uninstall the u1 packages, and re-install them from the raring release pocket instead
[22:29] <facundobatista> dobey, I suspected automatic disabling in the upgrade when trying to understand that ^, yes
[22:29] <facundobatista> dobey, I already re-enabled it and I'm updating
[22:35] <facundobatista> dobey, great! now all seems ok, thanks!


[10:09] <tumbleweed> SPAM: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/602676/comments/6
[10:09] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 602676 in abe (Ubuntu) "Description: Abe's Amazing Adventure" [Low,Fix released]
[10:29] <tumbleweed> and another: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/oss4/+bug/519577/comments/24
[10:29] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 519577 in oss4 (Ubuntu) "package oss4-dkms 4.2-build2002-2 failed to install/upgrade: oss4 kernel module failed to build" [Undecided,Fix released]
[11:29] <adeuring> tumbleweed: thanks for leting us know!
[13:20] <rick_h> adeuring: taking over, thanks
[13:20] <adeuring> rick_h: thanks!
[13:51] <scott__> hi all
[13:52] <scott__> i'm having some trouble using launchpad.
[13:52] <rick_h> what's up scott__ ?
[13:52] <scott__> I'm seeing what I believe to be this bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server/+bug/597895 in oneiric
[13:52] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 597895 in xorg-server (Ubuntu Natty) "X crashes on key press" [Medium,Fix released]
[13:53] <scott__> how can I open the bug on oneiric?
[13:54] <scott__> for example I've tried 'also affects project' and 'also affects distribution' but I can't seem to figure out how to re-open this bug on the oneiric package (I think it's a regression)
[13:54] <rick_h> looking
[13:57] <rick_h> adeuring: do you know how we could do this? I'm not seeing a way to attach to a series
[13:57] <ts2> you need to be a bug contact (right?)
[13:58] <rick_h> ts2: yea not sure, I've never done that and not seeing hte option on my end
[13:58] <rick_h> scott__: I am tempted to say that since this was marked fixed release that the best route might just be to file a new bug and start the process with your debug data
[13:59] <scott__> ah, okay.
[13:59] <rick_h> scott__: and if it does end up being this exact issue, it can be marked a dupe and tied back from the people that handle the bug
[13:59] <ts2> well I don't see the option either, but I do on one of the projects I am the driver/bug supervisor
[13:59] <rick_h> ts2: ok, thanks
[13:59] <rick_h> scott__: yea, I'd go with a new bug because if it ends up being different you want to have the overlap anyway
[13:59] <scott__> that's fine, I just wanted to make sure I wasn't missing something obvious
[13:59] <scott__> thanks for the help! :-D
[13:59] <rick_h> you can reference this bug that it sounds very similar for sure
[14:00] <scott__> rick_h: yup, will do.
[14:00] <adeuring> scott__, rick_h: there should be a way to add another bugtask for the existing bug; let me check
[14:04] <adeuring> scott__:, rick_h: ts2 s right: you must be a bug contact in order to add a bugtask for a distro series
[14:04] <scott__> adeuring: okay, thanks for that
[14:04] <scott__> I'll just create a new bug.
[14:05] <scott__> report.
[15:26] <Forage> It's now the 3rd day in a row that I'm unable to upload a package to launchpad because my e-mail address is considered invalid, which it is not.
[15:27] <Forage> Is someone available to have a look at it?
[15:27] <Forage> I already filed a bug but got no response so far: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/186189
[15:30] <dobey> Forage: what is the entry in debian/changelog? i think the entries have to be as "Name<EMAIL_ADDRESS>do you have only<EMAIL_ADDRESS>there?
[15:30] <EvilResistance> debian/changelog needs to be Name<EMAIL_ADDRESS>yes
[15:30] <EvilResistance> case in point, mine: Thomas Ward<EMAIL_ADDRESS>[15:30] <EvilResistance> if its not in that format yo uget a reject
[15:31] <Forage> which change wil are we talking about exactly? the generated xxx_source.changes?
[15:31] <Forage> s/wil/file
[15:31] <dobey> Forage: in debian/changelog in the source package
[15:32] <Forage> ah
[15:32] <dobey> Forage: the line with the email/date on it, attributing the changes.
[15:32] <Forage> for some weird reason it has "Age Bosma<EMAIL_ADDRESS>instead of "Age Bosma<EMAIL_ADDRESS>[15:32] <EvilResistance> that'd be problematic :P
[15:32] <dobey> yes
[15:33] <dobey> that's the problem then :)
[15:33] <EvilResistance> fwiw, you could use 'dch' to modify the changelogs
[15:33] <EvilResistance> Debian mentors pointed me to that thing :p
[15:33] <Forage> I don't understand how it happend, I used it before
[15:33] <EvilResistance> might be some update or something being more strict.
[15:33] <EvilResistance> but i'd have it just use <email> rahter than <'email'>
[15:34] <Forage> yeah, of course
[15:34] <EvilResistance> that *should* fix the thing, if it doesnt there might be something else going on
[15:34] <EvilResistance> granted, its been a while since i've been packaging, due to a linux implsoion :/
[15:34] <Forage> weird, in previous packages I uploaded the e-mail address is included fine
[15:35] <EvilResistance> <EvilResistance> might be some update or something being more strict.  <--
[15:35] <EvilResistance> i've seen worse :P
[15:36] <Forage> well, that would explain the failed upload, not the changed inclusion :-P
[15:38] <Forage> thanks guys, lets see what it does now
[15:41] <Forage> succes!
[15:41] <Forage> muchas gracias
[15:42] <EvilResistance> yep, but remember, the format of the changelog is in Debian policy: Name <email>
[15:42] <EvilResistance> so the ' chars wont help
[15:42] <Forage> I know, I removed the quotes now
[15:43] <Forage> If I would have seen it I would have considered it incorrect as well
[15:43] <EvilResistance> :)
[15:43] <Forage> consider it a RFE for launchpad to supply more correct/complete error massages ;-)
[15:44] <Forage> it does not have the quotes in the e-mail
[15:58] <dobey> Forage: i don't think the error is from LP. it's from an underlying packaging tool
[16:00] <Forage> ah
[16:00] <Forage> too bad
[16:01] <dobey> Forage: though i'm sure you could file a bug against whatever tool that is, and get the message improved
[16:01] <dobey> (i'm not sure what exactly generates that error message)
[16:02] <Forage> launchpad is a black hole too me, I have no clue what happens in the background by what
[16:03] <Forage> pbuilder did its job fine locally
[16:03] <dobey> there was almost certainly a lintian warning/error listed about the e-mail address though :)
[16:10] <deryck> rick_h, over to me now.
[16:12] <rick_h> deryck: ty
[16:24] <CarlFK> assuming I have a GPG key (which I need for pushing to a PPA, right?),  where would I find it?
[16:26] <EvilResistance> open up the program 'seahorse' in GNOME, it'll be able to access your keyrings, if you have one it'll be listed there
[16:26] <EvilResistance> (in Ubuntu_
[16:29] <deryck> CarlFK, look in .gnupg
[16:29] <CarlFK> I backed up /home, wiped, installed new OS and /home, mounted backup under ~/oldhome... so I have to drill into thtat
[16:29] <CarlFK> thanks
[16:29] <deryck> np
[16:30] <CarlFK> hmm, don't see that
[16:30] <CarlFK> yes I do
[16:31] <CarlFK> this should just work, right?  mv /home/carl/oldhome/carl/.gnupg /home/carl
[16:32] <CarlFK> it isn't dependent on anything system wide in /etc or something?
[16:34] <deryck> CarlFK, right, should "just work."  assuming file permissions are right.
[16:35] <CarlFK> hmm, I have a ~/.gnupg with 4 files: gpg.conf  pubring.gpg  secring.gpg  trustdb.gpg
[16:35] <deryck> yup, sounds right
[16:36] <CarlFK> can I dump those?
[16:37] <deryck> CarlFK, what do you mean by "dump"?
[16:37] <CarlFK> delete
[16:44] <CarlFK> how do I send someone my GPG key?
[16:44] <CarlFK> im not seeing soemthing to send
[17:16] <ndec> hi. my team has an ARM private PPA on LP (tiomap-dev/ti-omap-private), and I can see the following status on the PPA page: A recent upload has resulted in 6 pending builds.
[17:16] <ndec> i am not sure if this is a problem, or actually something expected ...
[17:17] <ndec> i never noticed this msg, but it might be normal
[17:19] <EvilResistance> ndec, if someone uploaded a source package, or a packaging recipe started, and the 6 builds are more-than-one-platform, then that'd be semi-suspected behavior
[17:20] <EvilResistance> at least, from the builders...
[17:22] <ndec> EvilResistance: i just got this comment from infinity on #ubuntu-arm, ndec, ogra_ : buildd-manager was down, hence the queued builds going nowhere.  Got fixed just a while ago.
[17:22] <ndec> is that it?
[17:23] <micahg> ndec: probably, there seem to be some private builds building ATM
[17:47] <kiko> danilos, how can I get somebody to fix a translation sharing setup?
[17:47] <kiko> https://translations.launchpad.net/stoq/master
 "This project series is sharing translations with abootimg in Ubuntu Precise."
[17:47] <kiko> stoq and abootimg have nothing to do with each other :)
[17:47] <danilos> kiko, that's derived from packaging links
[17:47] <danilos> kiko, so, you need to fix those
[17:47] <danilos> kiko, sharing-details page should include details of that
[17:54] <danilos> kiko, should be fixed now
[17:56] <kiko> danilos, thanks
[17:57] <danilos> kiko, do note that packaging links are still "crowd-sourced", so others will still be able to create them, I suppose someone did it by mistake, but you should be able to edit them as the project driver (or so I'd hope)
[17:59] <kiko> doesn't seem like it, it probably only checks permissions from the distro side