[03:04] <Logan_> infinity: I just uploaded a new openmpi with the changes from openmpi1.6 in Ubuntu (except for one that was already applied).
[04:25] <infinity> Logan_: You applied the dh_shlibdeps one a bit wrong.
[04:25] <Logan_> Well, I adapted it to the new path...
[04:25] <infinity> Logan_: The whole point of calling dh_shlibdeps properly is to avoid needing to specify the path to fakeroot on the command line.
[04:26] <Logan_> ...oh.
[04:26] <Logan_> Would you mind fixing it? I guess I didn't understand properly. :(
[04:26] <infinity> Yeah.  Shouldn't hurt anyway as-is, but I'll fix it to be more correct, so I can bug the Debian maintainer (again) to take the proper fix instead of his hack. :P
[04:27] <Logan_> Sounds good! Also, can we get rid of the openmpi1.6 source package now?
[04:28] <infinity> We can if it no longer produces any binaries we care about.  I'll look.
[04:29] <Logan_> No rbdeps.
[04:30] <infinity> Might have been nice to provide some upgrade paths from 1.6 -> unversioned, but meh.
[04:35] <Logan_> infinity: Actually, do we have to wait until everything depends on libopenmpi1.6 first?
[04:36] <infinity> Logan_: No.  Since nothing depends on it currently except itself.
[04:36] <Logan_> rdeps isn't giving accurate output right now.
[04:36] <infinity> (Already removed)
[04:36] <infinity> I checked the binary packages, seemed sane.
[04:37] <infinity> The source check did indeed seem wonky.
[04:38] <Logan_> Okay. If there are any temporary dependency issues, they'll be sorted out shortly after I transition everything over so that openmpi 1.6 goes from proposed to release.
[15:26] <alkisg> apt:// links no longer work in firefox 26/trusty, is that by choice or a bug?
[15:30] <alkisg> E.g. try https://apps.ubuntu.com/cat/applications/htop/ and then click on "available on the software center"
[20:00] <Noskcaj> xnox, Mind if i merge gtk2-engines? debian appear to have fixed the automake issue
[22:06] <ari-tczew> robert_ancell: ping
[22:06] <robert_ancell> ari-tczew, hello
[22:09] <ari-tczew> robert_ancell: hi Robert, according to merge of seahorse. debian bug 732168 is relate to drop gnome-doc-utils. I added this one as an information about forwarded delta.
[22:11] <ari-tczew> you wrote it's not related, but it is
[22:12] <robert_ancell> ari-tczew, np, when they merge that in it will appear in the changelog
[22:13] <ari-tczew> robert_ancell: I'll add info about dropped libgnome-keyring-dev from B-D at the same bug, as well
[22:34] <ari-tczew> robert_ancell: about merge of cheese: you mean I don't need to mention removing patches which are applied upstream as far they weren't in Debian - why?
[22:35] <robert_ancell> ari-tczew, because when you write a changelog entry after a merge, write it like you had just taken the Debian version and made the Ubuntu changes. There's always loads of small Ubuntu changes that are removed in a merge, not worth listing them all
[22:35] <robert_ancell> Since Debian didn't have these patches they don't need to be mentioned
[22:36] <StevenK> I always mention Ubuntu changes that have been dropped in a merge
[22:36] <ari-tczew> robert_ancell: so it's enough if I write the reasons of dropped changes in bzr-merge or launchpad bug?
[22:37] <robert_ancell> Oh, well I see there is differing opinions. It's not a major point anyway
[22:38] <ari-tczew> Well, it depends on sponsor what he/she expect to have in d/changelog.
[22:39] <ari-tczew> robert_ancell: I just wanted to figure out that it wasn't my fault, as said - differing opinions.
[22:39] <robert_ancell> sure, not your fault
[22:41] <ari-tczew> robert_ancell: next, we didn't bump Standard-Version and 99_ltmain_as-needed.patch wasn't removed by me - they are Debian changes. Look version 3.8.3-1
[22:43] <robert_ancell> ari-tczew, no, my point was we should bump standards-version
[22:43] <robert_ancell> ari-tczew, which package for 3.8.3-1?
[22:54] <ari-tczew> robert_ancell: cheese
[22:54] <robert_ancell> ari-tczew, don't you mean 3.10.1-1sid1 then?
[22:55] <ari-tczew> robert_ancell: I mean 99_ltmain_as-needed.patch was removed in Debian @version 3.8.3-1
[22:55] <ari-tczew> not by me
[22:55] <robert_ancell> ari-tczew, right, but they were still in your branch, but not in the debian package
[22:56] <robert_ancell> so they hadn't been bzr rm'd
[22:56] <ari-tczew> robert_ancell: ok, I got it.
[22:56] <ari-tczew> next time I won't forget (hopefully)
[22:57] <ari-tczew> robert_ancell: could you sponsor bug 1259871 as well? Unfortunately I didn't find a bzr on ~ubuntu-desktop for
[22:58] <robert_ancell> ari-tczew, it's better to ask the ubuntu-gnome people for packages like that - I haven't been maintaining them
[22:59] <ari-tczew> robert_ancell: ok
[23:59] <cjwatson> robert_ancell: "we should bump standards-version" - in general Ubuntu uploads should not bump Standards-Version beyond what's in Debian, as it has negligible benefit.  http://people.canonical.com/~cjwatson/ubuntu-policy/policy.html/ch-controlfields.html#s-f-Standards-Version