thread_id
stringlengths 37
43
| source_file
stringlengths 35
37
| subject
stringlengths 0
231
⌀ | messages
stringlengths 88
34.9k
| message_count
int64 1
42
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032314.txt_24411
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032314.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Andres Serrano", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "10/10/2016 10:21:57 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "They're huge!"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Oct 10, 2016, at 6:06 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Great photos"}, {"sender": "Andres Serrano", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Monday, 10 October 2016", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Either one I guess. Just came back from Ireland where I have a show called \"Torture.\""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Oct 10, 2016, at 4:19 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "no good choice. how are u"}, {"sender": "Andres Serrano", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 4:09 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Jeffrey, \nI was prepared to vote against Trump for all the right reasons but I'm so disgusted by the outrage over \"grab \nthem by the pussy\" that I may give him my sympathy vote. \nI'm sure Bill C said things, too. \nAndres"}]
| 5
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032904.txt_24418
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032904.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Thomas J, .2ndr i"], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 4:54 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-\n\nDonald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Lando ri", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 10:57 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "You called it! How are you positioned re market?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Thomas J, .2ndr i"], "timestamp": "11/10/2016 9:58:12 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "long dow , short yen euro and pound. long reits,"}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022819.txt_24424
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022819.txt
|
Re: Viceland
|
[{"sender": "Matt Williams", "recipients": ["Martin G. Weinberg"], "timestamp": "August 13, 2018 at 3:15:32 PM EDT", "subject": "Re: Viceland", "body": "Thank you Marty,\n\nThe questions we wanted to reach out to Mr Epstein for comment are listed below. Feel free to contact me on\na after reviewing. Kind regards - Matt\n\nA former employee has told us that Donald Trump attended Mr Epstein's Palm Beach estate on at least two occasions. Does Mr\nEpstein recall hosting Donald Trump at that residence?\n\nOn one such occasion, it has been suggested to us that Mr Epstein and Donald Trump watched “young girls try on bikinis” while\nmaking comments on the their bodies.” Does Mr Epstein have any comment?\n\nHow does Mr Epstein respond to claims that women - some under the legal age of sexual consent - were used as “sex slaves” at his\nproperties?\n\nA former employee of Mr Epstein has alleged to us that Mr Epstein sexually assaulted her on\nnumerous occasions. Does Mr Epstein have a comment?\n\nDid or does Mr Epstein have cameras inside rooms at his Palm Beach residence?"}, {"sender": "Martin Weinberg", "recipients": ["Jeff Epstein <[email protected]>", "Martin Weinberg"], "timestamp": "Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 3:30 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Viceland", "body": "Fyi"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Aug 13, 2018, at 3:32 PM", "subject": "Re: Viceland", "body": ""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Aug 14, 2018, at 10:07 AM", "subject": "Re: Viceland", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "8/14/2018 2:09:34 PM", "subject": "Re: Viceland", "body": ""}]
| 5
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028613.txt_24428
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028613.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 5:39 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 5:41 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Jesusfuckingchrist....give me one of them....ready for a change"}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 5:43 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Im told southern District trying yo get out a rico claim against the org"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 6:18 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "You are not in nyc now are you?"}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 6:24 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "are you nuts. ima cowardly warm blooded jew. call me"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 6:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "will at some point....what time do you leave tomorrow"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 21, 2019 8:01 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": ""}]
| 7
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032472.txt_24433
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032472.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Feb 15, 2017 4:55 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "did you enjoy sultan?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 15, 2017 8:12 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "He was great."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Feb 15, 2017 5:24 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "btw. michael wolff is doing a trump book. spent 45 minutes on the phone with him over the weekend he asked if he could ask you some off the record questions re policy procedures, noramlly followed etc."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "2/15/2017 1:28:39 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Yes, of course."}]
| 4
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032216.txt_24439
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032216.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "10/10/2016 12:29:04 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "No. what happened? R u about to be dragged in?\nSent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Oct 9, 2016, at 8:21 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "trump roles out clintons four accusers. recall our dinner?"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029519.txt_24440
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029519.txt
|
Noam Chomsky Calls Dem Focus on Russia a 'Huge Gift' to Trump: 'They May Have Handed Him the Next Election’
|
[{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "4/20/2019 10:49:45 AM", "subject": "Noam Chomsky Calls Dem Focus on Russia a 'Huge Gift' to Trump: 'They May Have Handed Him the Next Election’", "body": "https://ww.mediaite.com/trump/noam-chomsky-cal1s-dem-focus-on-russia-a-huge-gi ft-to-trump-they-may-have-handed-him-the-next-election/"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025841.txt_24444
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025841.txt
|
Re: Fwd:
|
[{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 5:12 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "lets see how you feel sunday"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 5:18 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "Good advice."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 5:23 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "I don't want to give up my apartment in NY."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 5:34 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "no need to. call eric and get a data point"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 5:35 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "I will. The rent on the apartment is significantly more than the monthly salary."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 8:16 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "how much and who pays now?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 8:17 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "I have so much more info to tell you on Sunday."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 8:32 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "decision :easier, harder, more complex?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 8:38 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "Both harder and easier. He was there."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 8:46 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "I assume that means harder to say no, ? easier to say yes. ."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Saturday, September 20 2014 12:48 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "Harder to say no for sure."}]
| 11
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025699.txt_24447
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025699.txt
|
Do French people generally identify more with Germans, Italians, or Spaniards?
|
[{"sender": "Quora Digest [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["[email protected]"], "timestamp": "7/4/2019 9:34:40 AM", "subject": "Do French people generally identify more with Germans, Italians, or Spaniards?", "body": "Jeffrey's Digest\n\nTOP STORIES FOR YOU\n\nDo French people generally identify more with Germans, Italians, or Spaniards?\n\nHendrik Vanger, studied at Pompeu Fabra University\n\nI am not French, I am Spanish, so my answer will be about my own impression of France,\nhaving been in the country several times and knowing some French people.\n\nCulturally, t...\n\nRead More »\n\nMy dad is a US citizen and I'm currently on F1 visa. Can he file for me while\nI'm in the US?\n\nEee\n\nKathryn Berck, Retired US consular(visa) officer, INTJ,CASA,writer,dog saver"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032910.txt_24449
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032910.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Ken Starr"], "timestamp": "Nov 10, 2016, at 4:03 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "any new york plans"}, {"sender": "Ken Starr (TE", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:11 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Thanks for checking in. I'll make some. What timing would work for you?\n\nSent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Ken Starr"], "timestamp": "11/10/2016 10:14:13 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "you are always welcome. if you would like to visit caribean , ican organize. anytime with wife your\n\ncall. otherwise new york dec.6-9? \\\n\ninteresting times. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-\nclaimed-assaulted-Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-\nstory.html"}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031079.txt_24451
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031079.txt
|
Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?
|
[{"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "April 6, 2011 10:28:36 AM MST", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Okay, will do."}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Rebecca Watson"], "timestamp": "Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 1:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "haven't heard from\n\nok.. I just sent an additional email which moderates this.. everyone was a victim, including Jeffrey here..\nand there was no happy resolution.. please add.. \"probably everyone was a victim, with no happy resolution\n\nor consequences of these activities\", after \"was the victim in this case.\"."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, at 3:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "no it was appreciated. thanks"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:31 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Just so you know.. you can read from bottom up.. you may be mad that I was blunt...\n\nyou.. hope all is well.."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "4/6/2011 10:55:39 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "noiam in paris thanks"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 12:18 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Beyond anything else, you are my friend. I hope we can both always remember that, no matter what.\n\nAre you coming this weekend at all?"}]
| 6
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023246.txt_24466
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023246.txt
|
tight schedule lets try a set time to speak
|
[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella <"], "timestamp": "Thu, May 12, 2016 at 6:17 AM", "subject": "tight schedule lets try a set time to speak", "body": "Leon, you hired me to produce a work of art. it was not inexpensive. the value far exceeds any other piece in your collection.- by FAR. It took me 30 years to be able to craft such a work. I understand your desire to modifiy my work, in doing so you have brad telling me , just a bit more red., here let me show you, you yourself pick up a brush a add some strokes. you have joslin spray water on it to maintain it. I vigorously complain that joslin in ruining my work .. you describe me as zeus, i describe it as artist and a reaction to his work being ruined. however Im aware that you own the work and you have the right to paint over it. tear it up , put it in the closet in the basement . its yours.\n\nI was told that Toms office is sending someone in ,or some people in, to review \"some things.\" brad told me ,the partnership accounting. I know absolutely nothing more than that. though bringing in his team was my idea . Having them review things without even asking for my input , or let alone my direction ,is ridiculous. but.. I guess you wanted to save money. ?\n\nThe audit has brought to the fore the lack of your office quality that 1 have been violently squawking about. ie. children playing with works of art. . It is inconceivable to me that John castrucct is still there , Joslin part time, but relied on . joe error prone and brad a corporate bandleader talking about the office's finance team, accounting dept, and directing wendy to do things that are clearly not in your interest. ( saving money again?) its nuts!! . a still non-existent IT dept. impossible , it was the first thing on my list of things that were needed to be done. Still no trading accounts to speak of , though its prophylactic quality has been discussed over and over during the past three years . computers do not read Page Six. the women atthe IRS do.! you said your motivation in keeping this group of part timers"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025349.txt_24473
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025349.txt
|
Re: Is Donald still feeling good
|
[{"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Sun, May 28, 2017 at 7:22 PM", "subject": "Re: Is Donald still feeling good", "body": "R u still plugged in to the show?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["LHS"], "timestamp": "Sunday, May 28, 2017 7:28 PM", "subject": "Re: Is Donald still feeling good", "body": "wild, there will be some changes this week.. funny but kaslowitz is getting turned down repeatedly, by firms unwilling to represent donald."}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Sun, May 28, 2017 at 7:36 PM", "subject": "Re: Is Donald still feeling good", "body": "More would represent Donald if Kaslowitz out of picture. Not surprising, very hard to be law firm representing POTUS and know what to do when potus lies to u.\n\nMy world thinks poorly of Gorelick for representing Jared.\n\nHow guilty is Donald?\n\nOf crudity surely\nOf gross ignorance surely\nOf being utterly without the intellect temperament for job surely\nOf being over line on family profiting very likely\nOf gross disregard for appearances almost surely.\nOf Russians having financial leverage. Less clear\nOf Russians helping in. Election w complicity of his campaign plausible but not certain\nStrikes me if u work for Donald u don't free lance so he is guilty of whatever his campaign did.\nDo u agree w foregoing?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["LHS"], "timestamp": "On May 28, 2017, at 7:49 PM", "subject": "Re: Is Donald still feeling good", "body": "BTW, still not sure why michael klein decided to try to attack me. wasn't smart or necessary, . used our friendship as a source, . thought you should know. not nice"}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Sun, May 28, 2017 at 8:49 PM", "subject": "Re: Is Donald still feeling good", "body": "With demand happy to consider and likely do. Dont want to go sucking up.\nDid Klein do it again? Agree bad business. Or are u referring to what u talked about months ago."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["LHS"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 9:13 PM -0400", "subject": "Re: Is Donald still feeling good", "body": "prospectus"}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 11:08 PM", "subject": "Re: Is Donald still feeling good", "body": "Lisa biz"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["LHS"], "timestamp": "6/2/2017 7:46:46 AM", "subject": "Re: Is Donald still feeling good", "body": ""}]
| 8
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029573.txt_24478
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029573.txt
|
Re: invitation
|
[{"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["Jeffrey"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 10:52 AM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "Dear Jeffrey, \nHere is an invitation you can forward. Fingers crossed. \nI'm going upstairs to hunt for my copy of Lolita, or will get on my kindle and reread on our way to \nAustralia. I may have lent it to one of my kids. I would recommend reading My Antonia by Cather next \ntime you're on a long plane trip. The prose is gorgeous, and the book has-- come to think of it-- similar \nthemes to Lolita in that it's about a man whose whole life is stamped forever by his impression of a young \ngirl. \nThank you for this help with Serena. I'm so sorry about what happened with WA. I will keep the \"bootleg\" \nepisode and hope to release someday. It's so good, and he was so kind to read the poem with me and you \nwere so kind to make it happen."}, {"sender": "J [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Lisa New"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 11:05 AM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "Needs edit. Start with id like you to join clinton ..eyc"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["J [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 7:30 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "Jeffrey, \nHow's this"}, {"sender": "J [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Elisa New"], "timestamp": "11/25/2018 11:56:06 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "count how many times you say I or me?"}]
| 4
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031328.txt_24482
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031328.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "[email protected]", "recipients": ["[email protected]"], "timestamp": "5/18/2011 11:27:18 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Somewhere"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Gmax"], "timestamp": "Wed May 18 06:37:36 2011", "subject": "Re:", "body": "do you have photos from our clinton trip to africa"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032737.txt_24493
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032737.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 3:39 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-close-is-donald-trump-to-a-psychiatric-breakdown?ref=home"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 11:02 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Am I seeing you tomorrow morning?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 8:06 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yes 730?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "3/24/2018 3:10:06 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Later possible? Need my beauty sleep"}]
| 4
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031086.txt_24494
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031086.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic (boC3)"], "timestamp": "Friday, January 28, 2011 7:35 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I can find out if mick jagger, ken starr, clinton . julie taymor , are in town/? I suggest we leave it till mon night.. I will have no trouble getting anyone you want . but 1 think it best after the three of us noodle a bit/."}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic (bgC3)", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 6:29 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Just landed to Iga.\n\nAre you in?\n\nIs it 7:30pm tmr ok? | will come w bill at that time. Pls let me know.\nb"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic (bgC3)"], "timestamp": "1/30/2011 11:35:21 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yes, would you like to come by, or are youyou as jetlagged as me,, sultan just left. I will be up for another hour or so.. yes 730 tomorrow is great"}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025100.txt_24497
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025100.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "10/21/2016 7:48:57 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Ailes said he gave up trying to give advice, that Trump was the boy in pre-school who you just knew was going to throw a truck at another kid's head."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 3:46 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "did trump also ignore ailes? wild"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033429.txt_24498
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033429.txt
|
Re: Trump Officials Tried To Rush Nuclear Technology To Saudis, House Panel Finds
|
[{"sender": "J <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 19, 2019, at 3:24 PM", "subject": "Trump Officials Tried To Rush Nuclear Technology To Saudis, House Panel Finds", "body": "Trump Officials Tried To Rush Nuclear Technology To Saudis, House Panel Finds\n\nhttps://www.npr.org/2019/02/19/695954246/trump-officials-tried-to-rush-nuclear-technology-to-saudis-house-panel-finds?ft=nprml&f=1001"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribs Ii", "recipients": ["J [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "2/19/2019 8:25:24 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump Officials Tried To Rush Nuclear Technology To Saudis, House Panel Finds", "body": "Saw it"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029280.txt_24503
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029280.txt
|
Re: From Politico Magazine
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Joi Ito"], "timestamp": "12/12/2016 7:52:15 PM", "subject": "Re: From Politico Magazine", "body": "talk to danny hillis he had some legisative ideas"}, {"sender": "Joi Ito", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 1:26 PM", "subject": "Re: From Politico Magazine", "body": "Any ideas?"}, {"sender": "Margaret Slattery <a>", "recipients": ["ET ies"], "timestamp": "November 28, 2016 at 3:04:51 PM CST", "subject": "From Politico Magazine", "body": "Dear Joi,\n\nHello, I’m writing from Politico Magazine, where we’re working on a special package of stories timed to Donald Trump’s inauguration in January, and I wondered if you would be interested in contributing.\n\nAs he prepares to take office, our plan is to publish a handful of out-of-the box ideas for President Trump, suggested by writers and thinkers from a variety of fields and ideological positions. Whether the idea has to do with politics, policy, personnel or governing style, we’re looking for suggestions that are specific and, above all, surprising; something inventive if slightly far-fetched is better than a pet cause or a well-trod policy proposal. (This exercise doesn’t require that you support or even agree with Trump, but it does require a willingness to engage.)\n\nDo you have an idea along these lines that you wish the new president would consider, whether something in economics or otherwise? If so, I’d love to hear, and we can discuss next steps from there. Ultimately, we’re aiming to publish a handful of short pieces (about 800 words each) as a package of proposals.\n\nMany thanks, and please let me know if you have questions.\n\nMargy Slattery\n\nDeputy Editor, Politico Magazine"}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025128.txt_24509
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025128.txt
|
Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is ‘stunned’ by president’s rhetoric
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 7:02 PM +0400", "subject": "Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is ‘stunned’ by president’s rhetoric", "body": "evangelicals confirmed in their belief of a divine hand. Ikid younot. their view. how else ,could one explain DJT winning. To a person they never knew him."}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 11:10 AM", "subject": "Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is ‘stunned’ by president’s rhetoric", "body": "Softbank deputy guy i liked and seemed aware and honest re Son.\nLots of slathering to saudis. I yipped about inclusion.\n\nI observed that half the IQ In world was possessed by women without mentioning they are more than 51 percent of population....\n\nMnuchin plumbs new depths.\n\nWar seems more likely than I used to think\n\nDjT is world s luckiest guy in terms of opposition, economy etc. still think his world will collapse.\n\nI’m trying to figure why American elite think if u murder your baby by beating and abandonment it must be irrelevant to your admission to Harvard, but hit on a few women 10 years ago and can’t work at a network or think tank. DO NOT REPEAT THIS INSIGHT"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 7:46 PM +0400", "subject": "Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is ‘stunned’ by president’s rhetoric", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Larry Summers <ns", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "10/27/2017 3:46:57 PM", "subject": "Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is ‘stunned’ by president’s rhetoric", "body": "Lot of ruin in a nation"}]
| 4
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033401.txt_24511
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033401.txt
|
Trump Officials Tried To Rush Nuclear Technology To Saudis, House Panel Finds
|
[{"sender": "J [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["nicholas.ribis in"], "timestamp": "2/19/2019 8:24:07 PM", "subject": "Trump Officials Tried To Rush Nuclear Technology To Saudis, House Panel Finds", "body": "Trump Officials Tried To Rush Nuclear Technology To Saudis, House Panel Finds\n\nhttps://www.npr.org/2019/02/19/695954246/trump-officials-tried-to-rush-nuclear-technology-to-saudis-house-panel-finds?ft=nprml&f=1001"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023062.txt_24512
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023062.txt
|
Re: Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell
|
[{"sender": "Mark Cohen <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["NY Max <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Fri, 4 Mar 2011 11:14:35 -0500", "subject": "FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "FYI, following up on my email of this morning. Again, I have no intention of responding unless you direct otherwise."}, {"sender": "Annette Witheridge", "recipients": ["Brett D. Jaffe"], "timestamp": "Friday, March 04, 2011 11:12 AM", "subject": "Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "Dear Brett Jaffe,\n\nI left you a telephone message earlier. The Mail on Sunday newspaper is running a story on Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, Prince Andrew and others this weekend.\n\nWe urgently require responses from Ms Maxwell to the following questions. Our deadline is noon tomorrow. My telephone numbers are\n\nAnnette Witheridge\nOn behalf of the Mail on Sunday\n\n1. [redacted allegation]\n2. [redacted allegation]\n3. [redacted allegation]\n4. [redacted allegation]\n5. [redacted allegation]\n6. [redacted allegation]\n7. [redacted allegation]\n8. [redacted allegation]\n9. [redacted allegation]\n10. [redacted allegation]\n11. [redacted allegation]\n12. [redacted allegation]\n13. [redacted allegation]\n14. [redacted allegation]"}, {"sender": "G Maxwell <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 8:28 AM", "subject": "FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Alan M. Dershowitz"], "timestamp": "Fri, 4 Mar 2011 08:37:01 -0800", "subject": "Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Alan Dershowitz", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 9:20 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, March 4 2011 05:21 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": ""}]
| 6
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031806.txt_24514
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031806.txt
|
RE: AVGO
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Paul Barrett", "Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "Friday, July 13, 2018 7:11 AM", "subject": "RE: AVGO", "body": "Im not angry, sorry, it is sad. it is apparent that you have no experience trading. we both made a mistake. . the spy trades were the results of a rank amatuer.. you took a postion on the direction of the market. ok. you decided to play it extra short time and short. . why? becaue the options are cheaper. ? knowing full well that time premium was running. . first silly move. . I allowed as promised to give you authority. . you set a target. . it hit the traget, you moved in back. based on media reporting on trump visit? you didnt act. the market dipped and you panicked. . AMATEUR. wrong options wrong timing, no discipline and as a percentaage of investment, a one day dip fof 25%. wanting to buy the highter strike, is ok. but why the same month? why the same moment. why the same index. . sorry. I have taught this for many years. and your grade is an F. not one good move in many. . re broadcom. the crack happend in the morning, options were higher. no alternative presented. no analysis. , this is no way to manage money. I have lost a great deal of money hoping you would be able to do as you promised you could . would.. Had you told me, jeffrey I d like to try a new job as a manager lets start slow I can learn. i would be less annoyed. you told me you had great confidence knew the risks and truly believed you would be able to raise money .do well and prosper. . If it were not you, this would have ended months ago.. we should work on a solution . not sure yet what shape it takes."}, {"sender": "Paul Barrett", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "Friday, July 13, 2018 9:42 AM", "subject": "RE: AVGO", "body": "Jeffrey\nI understand your frustrations and appreciate your willingness to figure out a solution. I have some ideas which I will send you over the weekend if that is OK.\nRe Broadcom: the stock is up $1.20 at $211.50. After the initial shock reaction of yesterday, there has been a lot of focus on the cost synergies etc. but very little conviction in revenue opportunities. However until we hear from management as to the overall intentions of the deal, uncertainty will linger.\nThis morning the pricing is as follows:\nAug 200 Puts cost $4.10\nSept 200 Puts cost $7.90\nEarning are on 08/30. So worst case is the uncertainty lingers until then which would argue to buy the Sept puts.\nHowever I still prefer buying the Aug puts as I would fully expect more clarity from management before August expiry.\nPaul"}, {"sender": "Paul Barrett", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Friday, July 13, 2018 1:40 PM", "subject": "Re: AVGO", "body": "Any thoughts on the AVGO Aug puts? Stock trading at 204.50.\nAug puts now $6.50"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Paul Barrett"], "timestamp": "Friday, July 13, 2018 1:55 PM", "subject": "Re: AVGO", "body": "lye had enough!!!! Which puts ???"}, {"sender": "Paul Barrett", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "7/13/2018 6:13:06 PM", "subject": "RE: AVGO", "body": "My initial recommendation this morning was to buy the $200 Aug puts. I still think that is the best idea. The stock is now down 16% on a deal that no one fully understands. The CEO has a good track record regarding mergers. So I think it makes sense to keep the stock and own protection for the next 35 days until we hopefully get more clarity from management."}]
| 5
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031466.txt_24518
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031466.txt
|
Trump
|
[{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "5/16/2016 2:52:57 PM", "subject": "Trump", "body": "I am kind of shocked that our reporters did not contact you re the Trump/women story. Seems to me he got off rather lightly. How are you doing?"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021113.txt_24524
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021113.txt
|
Fwd: Announcing the 2019 Hillman Prize winners
|
[{"sender": "The Sidney Hillman Foundation", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 2:45 PM", "subject": "Announcing the 2019 Hillman Prize winners", "body": "Congratulations to the 2019 Hillman Prize recipients!\n\nSidney Hillman Foundation Names Winners of 2019 Prizes for Journalism in Service of the Common Good\n\nReuters, NBC News and MSNBC, ProPublica Receive Honors; Adam Serwer to receive Opinion & Analysis Prize\n\nNEW YORK — The Sidney Hillman Foundation announced Tuesday winners of the 69th annual Hillman Prizes, recognizing a Reuters expose of slum-like living conditions on U.S military bases, the Miami Herald's investigation into Labor Secretary Alex Acosta's sweetheart deal with serial sex abuser, Jeffrey Epstein, and NBC News and MSNBC's reporting on the Trump Administration's family separation policy, among other standout reporting in service of the common good.\n\nHannah Dreier of ProPublica won a Hillman Prize for reporting that showed how the government's bungled crackdown on MS-13 has torn apart the lives of Latino immigrants. The Atlantic's Adam Serwer, who has emerged as a defining voice of the Trump era, won for his essays on racism and Trump's political movement, and Anna Clark won for her book on the Flint water crisis.\n\nThis year's prizes were judged by writer Ta-Nehisi Coates, the New Yorker's Jelani Cobb, Reuters' Al Freedman, the New Yorker's Hendrik Hertzberg, the American Prospect's Harold Meyerson and The Nation's Katrina vanden Heuvel.\n\nThe 2019 winners of the Hillman Prizes are:\n• Newspaper — Miami Herald, Julie K. Brown and Emily Michot: Perversion of Justice\n• Magazine — ProPublica with New York magazine, Newsday, This American Life, New York Times Magazine, Hannah Dreier: Trapped in Gangland\n• Web — Reuters, Joshua Schneyer, Michael Pell, Andrea Januta, Deborah Nelson: Ambushed at Home\n• Broadcast — NBC News and MSNBC, Jacob Soboroff and Julia Ainsley: Torn Apart: Crisis at the Border\n• Opinion & Analysis — Adam Serwer, The Atlantic\n• Book — Anna Clark: The Poisoned City: Flint's Water and the American Urban Tragedy, Metropolitan Books\n\nReporting by this year's prize winners has had significant positive impact, including:\n• Reversal of the Trump administration's \"Zero Tolerance\" family separation policy\n• Three federal investigations, new legislation, widespread repairs, and a $386 million emergency program to inspect military housing for hazards\n• The exposure of pervasive bias and negligence by Long Island police, leading to federal and local investigations and reforms\n\nThis year's honorees follow in the trailblazing tradition of past winners ranging from Murray Kempton in 1950 for his articles on labor in the south and Edward R. Murrow in 1954 for his critical reports on civil liberties and Joseph McCarthy at the height of the Red Scare; to 2017 newspaper winner, David Fahrenthold, for exposing Donald Trump's sexual harassment and mismanagement of his foundation.\n\nThe Hillman Prizes are open to journalists and subjects globally for any work widely accessible to a U.S. audience. Winners will be awarded a $5,000 prize at the Hillman Foundation's annual ceremony in New York City on May 7.\n\n\"In a time when this country's highest powers have taken it as their business to demean the work of journalists, it is particularly significant for us to honor those who have taken up the tools of journalism to challenge corrupt power wherever it may reside,\" said Hillman judge Ta-Nehisi Coates.\n\nIn 2011, the Sidney Hillman Foundation inaugurated the Canadian Hillman Prize. This year's winners, Harvey Cashore, Bob McKeown and Kimberly Ivany of CBC's The Fifth Estate, won for their sweeping investigation into the research and regulatory failures that have put millions of children at risk on their way to and from school each day. Their reporting exposed fraudulent science behind Transport Canada's seminal seatbelt study and led the Transport Minister to form a task force with the provinces to look at implementing seatbelts on school buses across the country.\n\nThe Hillman Foundation announced Monday that CUNY professor and historian, Joshua B. Freeman, is the recipient of its 2019 Sol Stetin Award for Labor History. Freeman has written extensively about the history of labor, industry, modern America, and New York City. The Hillman Foundation established the award in 2005 to honor a labor historian who has made significant contribution to the field, researching and telling the stories of working peoples' lives.\n\nSince 1950, the Hillman's Prizes for Journalism honor the legacy of Sidney Hillman, an immigrant who dedicated his life to a \"better America.\" Hillman believed that a free press was essential to a fair and equal society. The Sidney Hillman Foundation has sought to carry on his legacy by honoring journalists who illuminate the great issues of our times—from the search for a basis for lasting peace, to the need for better housing, medical care, and employment security for all people, to the promotion of civil liberties and the battle against discrimination based on race, nationality, or religion.\n\nFor more information, including to RSVP to the event, please contact Alexandra Lescaze at 646-448-6413 or [email protected]"}, {"sender": "J [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Alan Dershowitz [1.1.11.110....ii]", "Martin Weinberg"], "timestamp": "4/23/2019 12:58:06 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Announcing the 2019 Hillman Prize winners", "body": ""}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026347.txt_24527
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026347.txt
| null |
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["BillGates", "Larry Cohen"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 19 2015 09:48 AM", "subject": null, "body": "I guess I won't be able to run for office for a while. the forbes 400 list is now over 3 trillion in wealth that will be transfered. obama will try to void the step -up , it won't pass this time, but more of an impetus for some, (though hardly needed)."}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025896.txt_24537
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025896.txt
| null |
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Noam Chomsky"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, August 05, 2015 7:48 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Only go to Greece if you feel well , I just had to send my plane to bring another lefty friend back from\n\nAthens to see a Jew doctor in New York ."}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025361.txt_24545
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025361.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Sultan Bin Sulayem"], "timestamp": "9/3/2009 11:18:47 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "she is your second biggest fan... iam the first. i sell dubai, to its detractors."}, {"sender": "Sultan Bin Sulayem", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 7:05 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "An interesting piece to read before you start your weekend. Guest Post by Jim Krane: Dubai, Not Obama, is the Mideast's Best Peace Hope Tuesday, Sep 01 2009, 3:11PMThis is a guest note by Jim Krane, a former AP Persian Gulf correspondent. His new book on Dubai, City of Gold: Dubai and the Dream of Capitalism, is available. As Americans, Israelis and Palestinians continue their endless peace-jockeying, a more hopeful solution has emerged. It is a fresh Arab initiative that depends neither on America nor Israel. It is Dubai. Dubai, you must know, is the flashy Gulf city-state that is one of the seven United Arab Emirates. In my book, I argue that Dubaians, descended from illiterate Bedouin who faced starvation in the 1940s, have authored the most exciting Arab accomplishment in 700 years. >From nowhere, Dubai has mushroomed into a trading city-state on the lines of Hong Kong and Singapore, with sidelines in real estate and tourism. Dubai accomplished all this without (much) oil, and without the help - or even recognition of the United States. While Washington has been caught up prolonging the Israel-Palestinian conflict and starting a war in Iraq, Dubai was erecting one of the worlds most spectacular cities. So, how can Dubai fix the Middle East? It certainly can't do much to help Palestinians suffering under Israeli misrule. But that is the point. Dubai has succeeded in spite of the plight of the Palestinians, and in spite of what Arab leaders describe as US meddling that stymies their development. One of the favorite themes of Dubai leader Sheikh Mohammed is that his counterparts should stop bloviating about the Israelis and start serving the interests of their own citizens. Dubai's wild growth backs up Sheikh Mohammed's message. His business-before-politics way is becoming a development model for the rest of the Arab world. But wait, Dubai is in financial trouble. How could it be a role model?Dubai's downturn is temporary. Being one of the worlds most globalized cities, it couldn't help but be infected by a global recession. The contagion kneecapped each one of its economic pillars: Shipping, logistics, tourism, and its binging real estate sector. Most of these pillars remain sound. Dubai's economic example isn't widely understood in Washington. But its a good thing. Emulating Dubai could make Arab countries more stable and secure, along with the rest of us. For America, which has mistreated Dubai despite synergies with our interests, its a windfall. If you remember, Dubai in 2006 bought US port operations and found itself vilified as a terrorist logistics center. Members of Congress now in the Obama administration -- among them the senator who is now president -- joined the Dubai-bashing. Well, it may turn out that this \"terrorist logistics center\" has one of the keys for fixing the Mideast's terrorism problem. The Dubai model is a mixture of social freedom, unbridled immigration, and raw capitalism. It is overseen by a government that is one of the world's least democratic. This is no accident. Dubai avoids both elections and the Arab obsession with politics, especially the syndrome of feeling slighted by the West. Dubai is pragmatic. It makes money doing business with Israel and Iran, countries shunned by other Arab states. The city's finessing of simultaneous friendships with Washington and Tehran is as deft as it is precarious. Dubai's government wrings efficiencies using schemes from Harvard Business School and General Electric. Its use of strategic planning is a new concept in the Middle East. Dubai conceives developments, like no-tax business parks, and builds them exactly as promised. In contrast with the surrounding police states, Dubai functions on the honor system. Alcohol is legal. Prostitution is tolerated. A nice example is the e-Gate scheme, which allows residents to use a biometric card to skip passport control. None of the neighbors has the confidence to replace state security with a smart card. Not Saudi Arabia, not Iran, not Israel. Saudis and Iranians, especially, find a refreshing dignity in Dubai, a respect for their ability to make the right choice. \"Friday you can pray, but Thursday night you might want to go to the bar,\" says a Dubai-based Saudi. \"It's up to you. \"Dubai is certainly taking risks. But rulers from Morocco to Iran are already Xeroxing parts of the Dubai playbook and waiting to see how the more controversial approaches pan out. For some, its a matter of self-preservation: Dubai's state-led development doesn't involve elections. For others its a bid to stop the hemorrhage of bright citizens and cash fleeing to Dubai. All of them ought to do more. Egypt, with its unemployed masses, could make use of Dubai's incentives for foreign investment. Syria might adopt its free trade ways. Iraq and Israel could use a dose of its religious tolerance. And its Gulf neighbors might streamline their bureaucracies as Dubai has. Of course, there are areas where neighbors emulate Dubai to their detriment. Dubai's abusive \"in-sourced\" labor market is one. Real estate is another. One hopes Dubai's property crash taught admirers what not to copy. And Dubai pays no heed to the environment. Thus Dubaians, with their monster 4x4s and chilled swimming pools, are the worlds most prolific polluters. But overall, Dubai's self-help mentality is the best hope for dragging this stagnant region into the global economic mainstream, with the accompanying stability and peace it implies. Its time Washington took notice.-- Jim Kranehttp://www.thewashingtonnote.com/archives/2009/09/guest_post by L12/"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025882.txt_24548
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025882.txt
|
ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
|
[{"sender": "Martin Weinberg", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "4/23/2015 8:11:57 PM", "subject": "Re: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE", "body": ""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Martin Weinberg"], "timestamp": "Thu, 4/23/15", "subject": "Re: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE", "body": ""}]
| 2
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031472.txt_24560
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031472.txt
|
Audio recording
|
[{"sender": "King, Kathryn", "recipients": ["Miller, Michael", "Katelyn Wohlford", "Y. Alp Aslandogan", "Weingarten, Reid", "Remzi Kulen", "Weinstein, Jason", "Osman Oz.", "David Mann", "Erin Billings", "Drake, William", "Will Bohlen", "Keough, Michael"], "timestamp": "Friday, August 05, 2016 12:27 PM", "subject": "Audio recording", "body": "All, \nI just received a copy of the audio recording with Q&A. The video recording will be available mid-to-late \nafternoon. As the file will be too large to distribute via email, we have two posting options: \n\na) Upload to Steptoe's FTP site, where the file is public but not (easily) discoverable to the casual Steptoe.com \nbrowser or searcher. We would send reporters the link, at which point they would download the recording in \norder to watch it. \nB) Upload the file to Steptoe's YouTube channel and set the security around the video so that it's only \nwatchable by someone who has the link. It would not be discoverable by anyone who doesn't have the exact \nURL (searching or browsing). The advantage with this option is the reporters could watch the video via the \nYouTube player, rather than downloading a file. \nI believe our preference is the second choice? \nThanks, \nKathy"}, {"sender": "Will Bohlen", "recipients": ["King, Kathryn", "Miller, Michael", "Katelyn Wohlford", "Y. Alp Aslandogan", "Weingarten, Reid", "Remzi Kulen", "Weinstein, Jason", "Osman Oz.", "David Mann", "Erin Billings", "Drake, William", "Keough, Michael"], "timestamp": "Friday, August 05, 2016 12:36 PM", "subject": "RE: Audio recording", "body": "Thank you, Kathy. I think for now the FTP site is the right choice for getting it in the hands of reporters. We don't want it \ntoo accessible to people who might slice it up, and a youtube link would travel faster, I believe. We eventually want to \ntrim the video into chunks and post on YouTube through AFSV's channels."}, {"sender": "King, Kathryn", "recipients": ["Will Bohlen", "Miller, Michael", "Katelyn Wohlford", "Y. Alp Aslandogan", "Weingarten, Reid", "Remzi Kulen", "Weinstein, Jason", "Osman Oz.", "David Mann", "Erin Billings", "Drake, William"], "timestamp": "Friday, August 05, 2016 12:48 PM", "subject": "RE: Audio recording", "body": "Will, if you're concerned that people might want to slice it up, then we likely should not go with the FTP site \n(option A), because the link would not be protected and someone could find it. Posting on Steptoe's YouTube \nchannel (option B) with secured settings would make the link only accessible to those who receive the link. It \nwould also provide reporters with a faster way to view the video since they would not have to download \nit. Does that make sense?"}, {"sender": "Will Bohlen", "recipients": ["King, Kathryn", "Miller, Michael", "Katelyn Wohlford", "Y. Alp Aslandogan", "Weingarten, Reid", "Remzi Kulen", "Weinstein, Jason", "Osman Oz.", "David Mann", "Erin Billings", "Drake, William", "Keough, Michael"], "timestamp": "Friday, August 05, 2016 12:50 PM", "subject": "RE: Audio recording", "body": "Ah, yes. That makes sense. Thank you."}, {"sender": "Keough, Michael", "recipients": ["Will Bohlen", "King, Kathryn", "Miller, Michael", "Katelyn Wohlford", "Y. Alp Aslandogan", "Weingarten, Reid", "Remzi Kulen", "Weinstein, Jason", "Osman Oz.", "David Mann", "Erin Billings", "Drake, William"], "timestamp": "Friday, August 05, 2016 1:10 PM", "subject": "RE: Audio recording", "body": "FYI — our vendor is creating a transcript from the audio recording, so I'll send that around when it's ready."}, {"sender": "Will Bohlen", "recipients": ["Keough, Michael", "King, Kathryn", "Miller, Michael", "Katelyn Wohlford", "Y. Alp Aslandogan", "Weingarten, Reid", "Remzi Kulen", "Weinstein, Jason", "Osman Oz.", "David Mann", "Erin Billings", "Drake, William"], "timestamp": "Friday, August 05, 2016 1:19 PM", "subject": "RE: Audio recording", "body": "Thank you, Michael."}, {"sender": "Will Bohlen", "recipients": ["Keough, Michael", "King, Kathryn", "Miller, Michael", "Katelyn Wohlford", "Y. Alp Aslandogan", "Weingarten, Reid", "Remzi Kulen", "Weinstein, Jason", "Osman Oz.", "David Mann", "Erin Billings", "Drake, William"], "timestamp": "Friday, August 05, 2016 1:27 PM", "subject": "RE: Audio recording", "body": "BBC story: \nhttp://www.bbc.comInews/world-europe-36988726"}, {"sender": "Keough, Michael", "recipients": ["Will Bohlen", "King, Kathryn W", "Miller, Michael", "Katelyn Wohlford", "Y. Alp Aslandogan", "Weingarten, Reid", "Remzi Kulen", "Weinstein, Jason", "Osman Oz.", "David Mann", "Erin Billings", "Drake, William"], "timestamp": "Friday, August 05, 2016 1:28 PM", "subject": "RE: Audio recording", "body": "USA TODAY and Al Arabiya as well: \nhttp://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2016/08/05/cleric-extradition-turkey-coup/88288220/ \nhttp://english.alarabiya.net/en/News/middle-east/2016/08/05/US-eyaluating-new-Turkish-documents-on-\nGulen.html"}, {"sender": "Will Bohlen", "recipients": ["Keough, Michael", "King, Kathryn", "Miller, Michael", "Katelyn Wohlford", "Y. Alp Aslandogan", "Weingarten, Reid", "Remzi Kulen", "Weinstein, Jason", "Osman Oz.", "David Mann", "Erin Billings", "Drake, William"], "timestamp": "Friday, August 05, 2016 1:49 PM", "subject": "RE: Audio recording", "body": "Wall St Journal: \nhttp://www.wsj.com/articles/lawyers-for-imam-wanted-by-turkish-authorities-fear-for-their-clients-life-1470418445"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein ([email protected])"], "timestamp": "8/5/2016 7:11:50 PM", "subject": "FW: Audio recording", "body": ""}]
| 10
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025598.txt_24571
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025598.txt
|
Re: $25K from ASU
|
[{"sender": "J <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Joi Ito"], "timestamp": "Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 1:10 PM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "Hey Jeffrey.\n\nHow are things?\n\nJust to let you know. We were able to keep the Leon Black money, but the $25K from your foundation is getting bounced by MIT back to ASU.\n\nSorry...\n\n- Joi"}, {"sender": "J <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Joi Ito"], "timestamp": "Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 1:18 PM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "No problem- Trying to get more black for you"}, {"sender": "Joi Ito", "recipients": ["J <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 1:24 PM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "Thanks!"}, {"sender": "J <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Joi Ito"], "timestamp": "Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 7:45 AM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "brutal press. . sorry . it seems im a symbol for all ills. :). if you hate the rich, the men , the trump types im your boy. at least for the moment. . hope you are well"}, {"sender": "Joi Ito", "recipients": ["J <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 11:08 AM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "I'm good. Good luck!\n\n- Joi"}, {"sender": "J <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Joi Ito"], "timestamp": "Apr 18, 2019, at 08:03", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/18/opinion/sunday/oliver- sacks-gardens.html?action=click&module=Opinion&pgtype=Homepage"}, {"sender": "Joichi Ito <joi@>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, April 18 2019 12:23 PM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "Nice."}]
| 7
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031125.txt_24572
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031125.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 10, 2016, at 4:55 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-\n\nDonald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html"}, {"sender": "Faith Kates", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "11/10/2016 11:49:04 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "She should be so lucky people are nuts\n\nSent from my iPhone"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032694.txt_24573
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032694.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 1:08 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I know -- have been reading it. Good old MW. You still talk to him?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 1:05 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/01/michael-wolff-fire-and-fury-book-donald-trump.html"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 2:12 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "No doubt he and DT know each other well too. Have to say, he is looking/sounding increasingly unhinged -- are you tempted to take any money off the table in the markets?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 2:14 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "no. but no questions donalds statement is goofy. . early dementia?"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "1/3/2018 7:17:38 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "You be judge -- wasn't here a time when he at least completed sentences?\n\nhttps://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2018/01/trump-cog-decline/548759/"}]
| 5
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033142.txt_24575
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033142.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "J <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Pritzker, Tom"], "timestamp": "Saturday, February 9, 2019 2:48 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "News?"}, {"sender": "Pritzker, Tom", "recipients": ["J <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 4:57 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "You are news!\nI am quiet.\nHave called for a Chairman's dinner on Feb 26 to discuss trade. Have mix of biz und govt bigfoots. Will need to get someone to staff me. Her job will be push and organize. May position her in DC. As the Zen Master said 'let's see'.\nOff to Asia mid week.\ntjp"}, {"sender": "J <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Pritzker, Tom"], "timestamp": "2/9/2019 10:00:59 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "sasse was told im a witness against trump. ? others were told I m a witness against clinton. . so my credibilitiy needs destroying, . unlikely. :)"}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021811.txt_24585
|
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021811.txt
|
Re: we'll see
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Nadia <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 1:44 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "I only met Jeffrey Epstein, after I was adult. ( over 18). I was never, ever, his \"sex slave \"\n\n. obviously a lurid chauvenistic categorization. which in my opinion could only have been\n\nmade by some loser of a repressed male reporter. He was always kind , funny and generous to\nme . These fantasy fabrications made by a delusional thief. ( charged with stealing from the burger\nplace and which she worked, though she claimed to paid thousands of dollars in cash and held at\nthe beck and call of the genious tycoon. ) . Her story telling had it been done while sleeping would\nhave been called dreaming, if awake, hallucinaitons but to the English press they are referred to as\nallegations . She claimed in the minutest of detail , her dinner with President Clinton on the\nCaribean Island, How he arrived . ( by black heli). where he sat. ,(on jeffreys left.) a21st century\ntale of power , sex, money. The fact is that this story is total make believe , fabricated on purpose\nto gain tabloid attention ,and easily refuted by readily availalble travel records of a former\n\npresident. . it defies belief that any person would take seriously such a preposterous story. little\ndifferent than her telling her father that she met the queen, whoops- he believed her though her\nmother at the relevant time complained that she must have been engaging in satan worship and\nasked that she be put her in a drug home. cmon. I am currenty a professional pilot with a spotless\nrecord. I have a checklist that I follow before every flight to verify that things are what they are\nsupposed to be , checking her story which the presss has refused to do would serve the public well.\nIn this case human error is merely a euphmisn for hijacking the truth ,"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Nadia <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 1:59 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "Yes, let's do it. I like most of it. Would like less personal attacks and more reasons why allegations are ridiculous..\n\nLove the fact checking story. Just a few days ago, I toyed with the idea of posting a photo of me doing a preflight inspection and saying I wished other\nprofessions would have that requirement before putting innocent people's lives at risk."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 7:01 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "I know, I like where it's going.."}, {"sender": "es", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 7:01 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": ""}]
| 4
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022945.txt_24593
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022945.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon iii"], "timestamp": "11/7/2017 2:55:20 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "As they are both bulkshitters"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon iii", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 10:26 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "iam more interested in al-waleed/saudi purge/Jared axis. al-waleed and prez go back a ways don't they?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 5:42 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://people.com/movies/harvey-weinstein-hired-intelligence-agencies-to-spy-on-accusers-rose-mcgowan/ the same boies that represents |. who makes totally fabricated claims re gore and clinton - boies clients. he refuses to ask them their version of events. They were never on the island and though she gave details of a dinnner. I have never ever met al gore or his wife.\n\nboies is going to be in the firiing line. from the biz view he represented Hank Greenburg AIG, , his fees were never paid as the appeals court overturned the win. but AIG as an insurance co. --_ ... phone only"}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031657.txt_24598
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031657.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "Feb 6, 2017, at 8:14 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "speak today"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "Feb 6, 2017 at 9:17 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes. In NYC actually."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "Feb 7, 2017, at 1:30 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "your man of the people\nhttp://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2017/02/07/president-barack-obama-kiteboards-horses-around-richard-branson-epic-vacation/97592260/"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers <q wrotc>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 12:03 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "It's ok.\nHe didn't wreck world and avoided scandal.\nWhat does Ruemmler say re his attitude towards women?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "2/8/2017 5:24:07 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Obama or trump or yours"}]
| 5
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025909.txt_24599
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025909.txt
|
Re: Follow up
|
[{"sender": "Immelt, Stephen J. PO", "recipients": ["Kathy"], "timestamp": "Feb 25, 2016, at 5:23 AM", "subject": "Re: Follow up", "body": "Kathy\n\nI don't want to pester you, but in the hope that you are still intrigued, I wanted to suggest that we try to set up an\nopportunity for you to meet Michael Davison, our global head of litigation. MlIchael is an International\nArbitration specialist based in London and a key player. He is also a lot of fun, notwithstanding his Scottish\nupbringing.\n\nLet me know.\nBest,\n\nSteve"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["Immelt, Stephen J."], "timestamp": "Saturday, February 27, 2016 10:08 AM", "subject": "Re: Follow up", "body": "Hi Steve,\n\nIam still intrigued and would like to meet Michael. I thinks it makes sense, though, for us to have a more\nspecific conversation about compensation before I meet with him. I don't want to put the cart before the horse,\nbut as I mentioned, this would be a big move for me, and it would have to make sense economically in addition\nto being the right move for other reasons we have discussed.\n\nI hope you are well. Cannot believe that Christie endorsed Trump!\n\nBest,\n\nKathy"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026849.txt_24600
|
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026849.txt
|
Fwd: Tweet from steven hoffenbergw (@stevenhoffenber)
|
[{"sender": "steven hoffenberg", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 19, 2016 at 11:04:10 PM EDT", "subject": "Fwd: Tweet from steven hoffenbergw (@stevenhoffenber)", "body": "DARREN INDYKE ESQ.\n\nJEFF EPSTEIN IS AT HOME IN NEW YORK CITY HAVING SEX WITH UNDERAGE GIRLS TO\n\nGET READY FOR ,\n\nHOFFENBERG VS JEFF EPSTEIN LAW SUIT IN FRONT OF FEDERAL COURT JUDGE ROBER\nT SWEET SDNY VERY SOON !!!!!! PONZI CRIMES AT TOWERS FINANCIAL BY JEFF\nEPSTEIN & STEVEN HOFFENBERG .\n\nJEFF EPSTEIN WILL FACE THE PONZI CRIMES IN THE ABOVE LAW SUIT VERY SOON.\n\nYOU ARE CRAZY FOR NOT SETTLING THE ABOVE CASE RIGHT NOW WITH THE TOWERS\nVICTIMS WHO YOU DID LEGAL WORK FOR WITH ROBERT GOLD ESQ.\n\nTHINK NOW AS THE ABOVE LAW SUIT FINAL DRAFT MAY BE READY TO FILE NEXT W\nEEK .\n\nPLEASE ASK JEFF EPSTEIN TO STAY AT HIS HOME\nIN NYC FOR THE LAW SUIT SERVICE ON JEFF EPSTEIN BY THE PROCESS SERVER WHO\nWILL BE AT 9 EAST 71 STREET NYC TO SERVE JEFF EPSTEIN VERY SOON.\n\nTOTAL COVERAGE OF THE LAW SUIT WILL BE PICKED UP BY ALL OF THE MEDIA AT T\nHE FEDERAL COURT IN NEW YORK CITY.\n\nHAVE A NICE DAY MR INDYKE\n\nSteven J. Hoffenberg\nNew York Post Publishing INC."}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "5/20/2016 3:54:08 AM", "subject": "Fwd: Tweet from steven hoffenbergw (@stevenhoffenber)", "body": "Sent from my iPhone"}]
| 2
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033156.txt_24607
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033156.txt
|
B727
|
[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Je vacation [[email protected]]", "Rich Kahn"], "timestamp": "5/27/2011 4:34:44 PM", "subject": "B727", "body": "Trump's 6727 sold for 2.7M,. \nSean very discussed with me this company was interested, unless he call you,. \nFrom Sean: \nThis buyer did have specs on your aircraft. They were looking at a 3.0 million budget but did not make \nan offer and it was too low. We did discuss it \nBest regards,"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032248.txt_24613
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032248.txt
|
Re: Patterson
|
[{"sender": "Michael Wolff <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 11:39 AM", "subject": "Patterson", "body": "A few things to think about: \nIf the Patterson book is being published in August, that presents some time frame issues. You would not be able to do a competing book or documentary before then. This is not to say that they shouldn't be pursued. In a sense, better that they know what Patterson's position is and, a year from now say, be able to counter it. I have some thoughts on book and doc to share at your convenience. \nThat being said, you do need an immediate counter narrative to the book. I believe Trump offers an ideal opportunity. It's a chance to make the story about something other than you, while, at the same time, letting you frame your own story. Also, becoming an anti-Trump voice gives you a certain political cover which you decidedly don't have now. Still, this necessary involves you going public. And so the most basic decision is about your willingness to do that. My view is that in a couple of weeks you could master message and technical proficiency. I know a bunch of people who could be very helpful here. This would involve something along the lines of you writing an op-ed, doing a high profile television interview (Charlie Rose, I'd say), and perhaps some social media efforts. \nSpeaking of which, again, I think a strategic plan, involving your public identity, philanthropic activities and interests, and the development of media allies, ought finally to be put in place. A big, comprehensive, expensive effort. \nThe alternative is to continue to keep head down and hope Patterson book is just more he-said she-said and Connolly getting lost in the reeds (which, as an inveterate conspiracist, he always does). My worry is that Patterson can be counted on to produce a bestseller, and while he isn't regarded as a serious writer, he'll surely be unloading a lot of tabloid copy. Because this will be tied to the election, the Trump-Clinton angle will amp up the attention 10-fold, in fact, possibly, a hundred fold. Possibly more than anything you've encountered before. \nMeanwhile--\nIn a lawyer's letter, I'd suggest including the following points--not necessarily legal, but a warning about how a press campaign might unfold (publishers are more worried about being caught in negative media controversy than they are of legal threats): \n1) Little, Brown has made on the record representations to at least one well-known journalist that it was not publishing a book by James Patterson about Jeffrey Epstein--possibly an effort to avoid inquiries about the questionable nature of the book; \n2) The actual author of the book, John Connolly, is someone other than the stated author, James Patterson. Connolly is known to have developed an obsession with Epstein, such that, his longtime employer, Vanity Fair, has refused to allow him to write about Epstein for the magazine; \n3) Sources have confirmed for us that Patterson has had little more than a minimal consulting role in the book, and that Connolly has functioned in every material way as the book's researcher and writer. We believe Patterson's \"authorship\" of the book will not stand up to scrutiny. And, indeed, that the entire notion of an extension of the Patterson franchise into nonfiction, as it has been used in fiction and children's book--effectively other authors writing under the Patterson name—presents a host of journalism ethical issues."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "On Mar 18, 2016, at 11:41 AM", "subject": "Re: Patterson", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "3/18/2016 3:57:38 PM", "subject": "Re: Patterson", "body": "On the shuttle back to NYC. About to take off"}]
| 3
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031999.txt_24617
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031999.txt
|
Re: My Wall Street 2 Story
|
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "Mon Jan 11 19:28:25 2010", "subject": "Re: My Wall Street 2 Story", "body": "terrific. i want to hear more about the trip"}, {"sender": "Peggy Siegal", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 6:32 PM", "subject": "Re: My Wall Street 2 Story", "body": "Wrote this for the February issue of AVENUE Magazine. Thought it would amuse you. Tell me what you think of it.\nxoxo Peggy"}, {"sender": "Peggy Siegal", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 6:17 AM", "subject": "Re: My Wall Street 2 Story", "body": "Will call you later. I am sick as a dog with a cold. I am supposed to go to Dr. Magnani this morning for a cleaning. If you get a \ncleaning with a cold does it make it worse of just infect the dental hygenist? \nHad a great lunch for Woody Harrelson and Ben Foster for \"The Messenger\" at Monkey Bar yesterday and hung with Clooney at the \nNew York Film Critics Awards last night. Tonight is the National Board of Review and I am thinking of staying in bed till show \ntime. Have a party for Clooney Wednesday nigh Graydon is hosting at Monkey Bar that we are working on. \nI have to fly to LA Jan. 14 and I am worried.. .1 have emailed three doctors this morning! \nWill call later...Mattie keeps saying she is going to show me how to email photos- will try to do today and call. \nI think I got sick in economy class from Lamu, Nairobi, Amsterdan, Newark from all those wanna be terrorists breathing on me in \nthe planes. \nDid you see \"Avator\". I do not have a dvd because its 3D. \nThe white American marines are wiped out by black people painted blue... its going to be highest grossing film in the world is an \nfew weeks beating out \"Titanic\" and will win the Oscar for \"Best Picture.\"\nxoxo Peg"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "1/12/2010 11:18:58 AM", "subject": "Re: My Wall Street 2 Story", "body": "sorry you are sick, go slow., no cleaning, stay in bed.. sorry.."}]
| 4
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032858.txt_24618
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032858.txt
|
Re: Patterson
|
[{"sender": "Michael Wolff [michaelwolff@??]", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 11:39 AM", "subject": "Patterson", "body": "A few things to think about:\n\nIf the Patterson book is being published in August, that presents some time frame issues. You would not be able to do a competing book or documentary before then. This is not to say that they shouldn't be pursued. In a sense, better that they know what Patterson's position is and, a year from now say, be able to counter it. I have some thoughts on book and doc to share at your convenience.\n\nThat being said, you do need an immediate counter narrative to the book. I believe Trump offers an ideal opportunity. It's a chance to make the story about something other than you, while, at the same time, letting you frame your own story. Also, becoming an anti-Trump voice gives you a certain political cover which you decidedly don't have now. Still, this necessary involves you going public. And so the most basic decision is about your willingness to do that. My view is that in a couple of weeks you could master message and technical proficiency. I know a bunch of people who could be very helpful here. This would involve something along the lines of you writing an op-ed, doing a high profile television interview (Charlie Rose, I'd say), and perhaps some social media efforts.\n\nSpeaking of which, again, I think a strategic plan, involving your public identity, philanthropic activities and interests, and the development of media allies, ought finally to be put in place. A big, comprehensive, expensive effort.\n\nThe alternative is to continue to keep head down and hope Patterson book is just more he-said she-said and Connolly getting lost in the reeds (which, as an inveterate conspiracist, he always does). My worry is that Patterson can be counted on to produce a bestseller, and while he isn't regarded as a serious writer, he'll surely be unloading a lot of tabloid copy. Because this will be tied to the election, the Trump-Clinton angle will amp up the attention 10-fold, in fact, possibly, a hundred fold. Possibly more than anything you've encountered before.\n\nMeanwhile--"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Mar 18, 2016, at 11:41 AM", "subject": "Re: Patterson", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Friday, 18 March 2016", "subject": "Re: Patterson", "body": "On the shuttle back to NYC. About to take off.\nSent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "3/18/2016 4:18:52 PM", "subject": "Re: Patterson", "body": "Nuts"}]
| 4
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025921.txt_24630
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025921.txt
|
GINGRICH VIEW OF TRUMP
|
[{"sender": "Realblond:s i! <i [is", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "March 9, 2016 at 9:26:23 AM CST", "subject": "Fwd: Gingrich view of Trump", "body": "Understanding Donald Trump The Washington Times January 8, 2016 by Newt Gingrich\n\nDonald Trump is a genuine phenomenon. He may or may not become the Republican nominee for president. He may or may not win the presidency even if he becomes the nominee. Yet it is clear that he is a phenomenon and that any history of the 2016 presidential race will have to spend a good bit of time analyzing Trump and his impact.\n\nFrom the time he announced on June 16, Trump has dominated social and mainstream media. He dominates the conversation despite the lack of paid advertising. Trump says outrageous things and his supporters shrug it off. At every turn, his poll numbers continue to rise.\n\nAs a step toward understanding this amazing performance, I spent part of the Christmas break reading his first bestseller, ‘The Art of the Deal’. Written in 1987, this book is a classic among American business books and has influenced a generation of entrepreneurs. Trump wrote ‘The Art of the Deal’ when he was 41 years old and having a successful run. The book’s popularity contributed to Time Magazine’s decision to feature Donald Trump on its cover in January 1989.\n\nThe portrait that emerges from this easy-to-read and remarkably interesting book is of an aggressive, ambitious person who is constantly pushing, constantly learning, and always seeking the next challenge. Reporters and analysts who are trying to understand Trump would be well served by slowing down and reading this nearly three-decade-old bestseller.\n\nThey would discover that Donald Trump has developed a remarkable set of rules and principles that allow him to make decisions with incredible speed. Trump knows a lot, but what is amazing is how rapidly he figures out what he doesn’t know.\n\nMy favorite story is of the Wollman Skating Rink in New York’s Central Park.\n\nThe Wollman Rink was a heavily used public skating rink which had fallen into disrepair in 1980. New York City tried for six years to fix it, spent $13 million, and the rink still was not ready to open. In June of 1986 Trump, who could see the rink from his apartment, finally got tired of the embarrassment and offered to fix the rink at his own expense. At first the city turned him down because its bureaucracy did not want to be embarrassed by someone fixing something they couldn’t fix. Trump kept pushing and finally out of embarrassment the city gave in.\n\nThe key part of the story is Trump’s reaction to being put in charge. He promptly recognized that he didn’t know anything about fixing a skating rink. He asked himself who built a lot of skating rinks. “Canadians!” he concluded. He found the best Canadian ice skating rink construction company. When the Canadians flew in to assess the situation, they were amazed at how bad the city had been at solving the problem. They assured Trump that this was an easy job. Trump fixed the six year embarrassment two months ahead of schedule and nearly $800,000 under-budget. (The city did end up paying for the work, and Trump donated the profits to charity.)"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032506.txt_24632
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032506.txt
|
Masa
|
[{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landor", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "3/3/2017 2:57:50 PM", "subject": "Masa", "body": "Have you met Masa yet? Seems to me he is a person you should know and you are a person he should know.\nhttps://www.nytimes.com/2o17/o3/o3/business/dealbook/masayoshi-son-sprint-and-a-bet-on-the-trump-economy.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=first-column-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032376.txt_24634
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032376.txt
|
ILE MOUSTIQUE
|
[{"sender": "Linda Pinto", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "11/25/2016 11:53:06 AM", "subject": "RE: ILE MOUSTIQUE", "body": "OK great | will ask the accounting department to prepare and send the first request.\n\nGood luck with the government..."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Linda PINTO"], "timestamp": "jeudi 24 novembre 2016 18:09", "subject": "Re: ILE MOUSTIQUE", "body": "please do so. Iam having a meeting with the government on the 15th re foreigb workers , painters. etc. sorry\n, Its beeen crazy with trump people here in palm beach"}, {"sender": "Linda Pinto", "recipients": ["Jeffrey"], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 11:49 AM", "subject": "Re: ILE MOUSTIQUE", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\n\nSince your last meeting in Paris and the meeting on site I have had no news from you. I would\njust like to know if you intend to go ahead with the interior design work because Florence is\nblocked and waiting. If you want to do it and since about ~70-80-90% of the project is\napproved then why don’t we start with what is sure and for the remaining points, such as the\nkitchen, we can see about these the next time you are in Paris.\n\nAs for the kitchen I understand new samples were sent yesterday. These samples are in grey\nwhich is not a very bright color for a beach house kitchen where perhaps blue might be more\nappropriate. Let’s see.\n\nIf you would like us to do the project we will send you a budget recap for the points agreed\nupon along with our first account and fees.\n\nBig kisses,"}]
| 3
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032512.txt_24638
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032512.txt
|
Re: TSA
|
[{"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 10:52 AM", "subject": "Re: TSA", "body": "Jeffrey\nTSA called me. They inform closing TSA inspection at 3pm.\nAsked if we could depart 2:30pm?\nIs 2:30pm ok for departure?\nOtherwise it would be after Trump's departure between 4 and 5pm\nIs 2:30pm inspection / departure ok?\nThx\nLarry"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 5, 2017, at 11:04 AM", "subject": "Re: TSA", "body": "are you at the plane already?"}, {"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "3/5/2017 4:21:06 PM", "subject": "Re: TSA", "body": "Not yet. I'll be there at 12:30pm"}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032362.txt_24639
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032362.txt
|
My sister's perspective from Europe
|
[{"sender": "Linde Stn hE", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "11/13/2016 6:26:33 PM", "subject": "My sister's perspective from Europe", "body": "I am looking at this from over here in Germany. American politics gets reduced in the end to only a few\nissues: pro-life or pro-choice, gun laws, and establishment vs. anti-establishment. Political categories\nare so wishy washy and intermingled with what is termed 'liberal'’ and ‘conservative’ that one forgets\nwhat they actually mean.\n\nOf course, not everybody who voted for Trump is sexist or a racist, but, on some level, they didn't care\nif he is. He knew how to gather momentum with the discourse he chose, and, even if he changes his tone,\nhe has let loose a storm. We will brace ourselves over here for Putin's eventual takeover of the Baltic\nStates. Putin has extended his power back into Republic of Georgia, the Crimea, and Armenia. Trump has\nsaid that he would not come to the aid of Nato allies if they were attacked. IS is the least of our\nproblems here in Germany; Erdogan is a much larger threat, for now.\n\nI don't see Hillary Clinton as being at fault. I see the growth of nationalism (all throughout the world,\nnot just in the USA) and an underestimation of the fear that non-Hispanic whites have about the\ntrajectory they are on to become a minority Cin the USA and other European countries).\n\nEvery news show, talk show, etc here is discussing and analysing the fallout of Trump's win. German\n\npoliticians are hoping to learn from it, to stem the growth of the right wing AFD party here. As far as I\nknow, Merkel is the only leader who congratulated Trump with a warning."}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028773.txt_24641
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028773.txt
|
FW: Tix for Jeffrey
|
[{"sender": "Kevin Frost", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Monday, May 07, 2012 6:39 AM", "subject": "Tix for Jeffrey", "body": "Boris:\n\nHere is the information sheet for Jeffrey to buy tickets. Tell him to use my name and the name of Magdalena Schuster on the email below. They’ve already approved him to buy tickets to Lifeball and the Gala dinner which happens right before the ball. I hope you guys are all planning to attend the dinner as well. You can tell your friend Jeffrey that he should buy the Mini car for me as a thank you. =)\n\nI’m getting in to Vienna on Friday afternoon. Let’s get together on Friday night.\n\nSee you soon,\n\nKevin Robert Frost"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein ([email protected]) [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "5/7/2012 11:21:03 PM", "subject": "FW: Tix for Jeffrey", "body": "It was not easy as people from LifeBall are very difficult. But I go it (they even now approved you - they needed to do a background check believe it or not! — as on that dinner will be president of Austria, Clinton etc) for two tickets — for you and your guest for a price that you do not need to buy a table (as they do not sell individual seats).\n\nGuy below is a good friend and he is a CEO of amFAR (amFAR has a joined dinner) — so he helped.\n\nThe nice thing about these tickets is that they are the most VIP. It includes reception, dinner, gala and after all party access.\n\nI have the same ones (through Bill).\n\nI also got two additional for you but it turns out that they are not the same level so I reached to Kevin for help.\n\nThe price is 2,500Euro per ticket (this is very reduced price as I think the regular one for this is 15K and it is hard to get it). They will need an email from someone from your office and name a your guest asap.\n\nThe plan for for Vienna I am sending you with my next email!\n\nBoris"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030575.txt_24645
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030575.txt
|
RE: <no subject>
|
[{"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, March 8 2011 11:17 PM", "subject": "RE: <no subject>", "body": "I think this is a great article I think ll was clearly very nice...I remember when I got the call when she was thinking about her writing the article 8 years ago...she was spot on here this is the article that citrick should work off of...\n\nHome all night"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tuesday, March 08, 2011 5:48 PM", "subject": "Fwd: <no subject>", "body": ""}, {"sender": "gmax <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["J Jep <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 12:17 PM", "subject": "<no subject>", "body": "Jeffrey and Ghislaine: Notes on New York's Oddest Alliance <http://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/2011/03/notes- on-new-yorks-oddest-couple-jeffrey-epstein-and-ghislaine-maxwell. html>\n\nby Vicky Ward <http://www. vanityfair.com/contributors/vicky- ward>\n\nMarch 8, 2011, 2:30 PM\n\n“T’ve got a story idea for you. The rebuilding of Indonesia. Or New Orleans. Or both. Go there. I’ve just been. You will never think the same way about anything again.”\n\nSo spoke not Bill or Melinda Gates, but Ghislaine Maxwell, the 48-year-old woman being written up everywhere at the moment as the alleged “procurer” of young women for billionaire Jeffrey Epstein.\n\nEpstein, 57, is the financier who spent a year in jail on charges of soliciting prostitutes—and now there is talk of another investigation because various women, now in their twenties and thirties, have come forward with allegations that he molested them when they were under-age. The allegations first surfaced in British newspapers, which have zeroed in on Epstein’s friendship with Prince Andrew, who has recently tried to publicly disassociate himself from his old pal.\n\nI wrote a piece for Vanity Fair in 2003 called “The Talented Mr. Epstein.” It was largely a business piece that focused on his mysterious exit from Bear Stearns in 1981, his close relationships with Jimmy Cayne, Les Wexner, the chairman of Limited Brands, and above all, the man who claimed to be his mentor, Steven Jude Hoffenberg, who is currently serving a 20-year-jail sentence for bilking investors in Towers Financial out of $450 million.\n\nThe piece alluded to Epstein’s great friendship with Maxwell, and how she introduced him to young women with whom he had sexual relationships. But, in the end, the story didn’t really go there, focusing instead on the issue that remains a mystery—how Jeffrey made his money, and how Ghislaine made hers.\n\nThis is not to say I didn’t hear stories about the girls. I did. But, not knowing quite who to believe, I concentrated on the intriguing financial mystery instead. But now the women have come back. Not the same ones, different ones. And their stories are bone-chilling. Journalists from England have phoned—and, in one case, flown—to ask me about"}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025935.txt_24646
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025935.txt
|
Re: Trump
|
[{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "5/25/2016 11:23:50 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "What was the letter?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wednesday, May 25, 2016", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "nussbaum white house counsel.. hillary doing naughties with vince"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, May 25, 2016 at 7:19 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "What's the thumb nail on Nussbaum/foster?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wednesday, May 25, 2016", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "maybe you can ask why bernie nussbaum got vince fosters letter quickly, that is a hillary problem. he would smile then you can ask his realtionsjipwith the elctricians unions and maralago . and out you go"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, May 25, 2016 at 7:12 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Job is to get the hard ones in without being ejected from the room. What's the one question that pierces through?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wednesday, May 25, 2016", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "do you want to be provacative .? trump shuttle. hawaiin tropic contests.. mortgage on mara lago. ? revenue of golf courses as income.??! , total debt of all cos .? people dont want to conribute money as he said he is worth over 10b , why should they? , calif already coming up short. . fatther bought chips in the casino to stave off bankruptcy, chips because it was better than a first lien. under the gambling rules. matt his bag man? his loan from his brother in law ( JUdges husband) how much did his father leave. his brother robert etc. otherwise you can just throw easys"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, May 25, 2016 at 7:05 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "I'm interviewing him this afternoon. Anything you think I should ask?"}]
| 7
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032864.txt_24649
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032864.txt
| null |
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Peter Thiel"], "timestamp": "5/10/2016 8:17:34 PM", "subject": null, "body": "trump delegate? fun"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032404.txt_24654
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032404.txt
|
Re: Chatter
|
[{"sender": "Bruce Moskowitz [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "1/1/2017 12:44:33 AM", "subject": "Re: Chatter", "body": "when you bring a donkey to the Kentucky derby you won't get into the starting gate and you certainly won't\ncross the finish line. This donkey brought four racehorses who will get to the finish line!\nThis was my major role hopefully we have a way forward.\nhttps://ww"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 31, 2016, at 7:16 PM", "subject": "Re: Chatter", "body": "Fun?"}, {"sender": "Bruce Moskowitz", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 7:57 PM", "subject": "Re: Chatter", "body": "FYI you were right. Happy New Year."}]
| 3
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032274.txt_24655
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032274.txt
|
General Election: Trump vs. Clinton
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 14, 2016, at 7:27 AM", "subject": "General Election: Trump vs. Clinton", "body": "http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/14/us/politics/republican-convention-speakers-donald-trump.html"}, {"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "7/14/2016 11:59:52 AM", "subject": "General Election: Trump vs. Clinton", "body": "funny you sent as i just read and saw Peter Thiel speaking\ni am hoping he will have some surprises as well..\npolls getting closer..\nGeneral Election: Trump vs. Clinton\nGeneral Election: Trump vs. Clinton\nCBS News/NY Times Clinton 40, Trump 40 Tie\nEconomist/YouGov Clinton 45, Trump 43 Clinton +2"}]
| 2
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030630.txt_24660
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030630.txt
|
News
|
[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey epstein [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "7/8/2016 8:10:26 PM", "subject": "News", "body": "Hi Jeffrey ! \nHere is a short video of me sailing under Golden Gate Bridge with my Stanford friends. Really rett : \ncan't express how happy I am to be here. Totally over the moon every day going to \nand exploring the area. \nNow I'm on the way to Tuscon to visit whose info I sent you for assistant r,osition. She \nwould love to pass interviews with you. She is smart and easy, her mum produced movie so \nknows a lot in film industry too besides other assets. \nWhat happens with zubair's project ? Do you believe it can be used in H.clinton's campaign or the Trump's \none to help her/ him win elections ? His goal is to propose it to them to find out in which states, what \nkind of people should be targeted to collect votes. He says that his algorithms can figure reasons why a \ncategory of people vote against a candidate and to help candidate to adapt the campaign to the people's \npreferences...well, to win elections at the end!"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023332.txt_24667
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023332.txt
| null |
[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella ll", "Leon"], "timestamp": "Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 8:20 AM", "subject": null, "body": "Yesterday , | again spent hours upon hours of my time with your office. ,( speak to brad to get flavor) and\nyou and i will discuss the results in gory gruesome detail on Friday. it mirrored many other weeks spent doing\nthe things that I don;t have the time to do.\n\nIn order to keep things in perspective, maybe reviewing an analogy I have used before with you, might be\nhelpful. You and your family are a 6 billion dollar corp. with an income between 250 -500 million dollars per\nyear. It contains a few operating biz's , a large wide array of existing investments, in various categories ,\n\na desire to enter into others. A panoply of loans, notes. purchases, wide range of all types of taxes. , planes.\nboats homes. . trusts ,grats. a crazy number of bank accts. ( with no oversight ) . law firms, acct firms, 800\npage tax returns, foreign firms. art consultants. construction consultants bill payers,\nhome mgmt.,vast multitude of Ilc's , including foreign, and with all that you only have a combined overhead\nof less that 3. million dollars.\n\nI have previously sent you the very same note that i have enclosed again below ,this time with highlights\n. I wrote it to you over a year ago. As my acute disability ( selective memory) seems to have been raised\nas one of your concerns , asarule I try to memorialize things in writing in an attempt to lay out issues that I\nfear may later turn out to be a problem. ie what i would and wouldn't do , - my responsibilities. ete and those\nthings that are not. below you will find details of things that I thought needed to be done, so that you\nwouldn't find yourself in the very place where you currently find yourself. however ,you chose to defer\nmany of my suggestions- see below -,until only weeks ago. ! you chose to defer the jpm acct. the art\npartnership on and on - into this year. and though the 60- 50 40 timber emails all carried with it a clear warning\nthat you needed to do something re personnel if it were to stabilize,- you chose to wait.\n\nONE YEAR AGO\nFeb 17 2014 i wrote:\n\nWith regard the more pressing issue I am uncertain of just how to proceed. I am torn, as my very strong\ninclination is not to be involved at all. It is extremely time consuming, delicate, fraught with many pitfall many\nthat will make you very upset and a major pain in the ass. I wrote you months ago that the quality of the people\ninvolved need to be upgraded. ( lucky for me these last issues arose way before the beginning of my\ninvolvement ) Iam also aware however of my overarching friendship obligations of ok, -given all the\ncomplexities who else can do it? problem.\n\nYour family office needs a daddy. children with good intentions are running around , sniping , nitpicking with\nlittle direction. As a stopgap measure I am suggesting , we put in Larry Delson to take charge Everyone would\nreport to him. Eileen included. He would however work for me. this is not, by a long shot my first choice as I\nprefer only being responsible and standing behind my own personal work ( ie the word DONE will no longer\nbe transmitted to reflect status stated by others )\n\nWith no commitment on my part whatsoever, to do it. So far as Ihave failed in my attempt in trying to\nthink through the problem creatively . My organizations handling of the more complex issues I believe you\nmight find very costly, very ! (however many structures available some risk sharing, maybe risk caps ,etc ) but\nwould require my teams doing the work , not yours. Ada should be only a trust, grat administrator. not sure\nwhat role you prefer for Eileen as you hired her initially to oversee investments. whether Rich your controller\nstays or not, is not urgent. having Tom report to a new person,- is. coordination with Suydam Kathy\nGregory, I would suggest limiting to one person. The increasing public profile needs to be taken into\nconsideration.\n\nTODAY\n\nWith your acquiesence , Eileen did not report to Delson ( he acting as a conduit directly to me) , she\ncontinued to provide bad info to both you ( cash flows , stock accts, structures. sales Etc) and me. and each\ntime with my many annoying calls to you made immediately afterwards that she was g.....y !!_ No one was"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031796.txt_24669
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031796.txt
|
Re: Trump advisors reportedly seeking a pardon for 'junk bond king' Milken
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "6/15/2018 1:26:04 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump advisors reportedly seeking a pardon for 'junk bond king' Milken", "body": "Did we get bank appraisal ayh"}, {"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 9:06 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump advisors reportedly seeking a pardon for 'junk bond king' Milken", "body": "https://www.cnbc.com/2018/06/15/trump-advisors-reportedly-seeking-a-pardon-for-junk-bond-king-milken.html\n\nTrump advisors reportedly seeking a pardon for 'junk bond king' Milken\nTae Kim\nSeveral of President Donald Trump's advisors are pushing him to pardon Michael Milken, Bloomberg News reported Friday.\nMichael Milken, 71, was known as the \"junk bond king\" in the 1980s and was convicted for securities fraud.\nBloomberg said former White House communications director Anthony Scaramucci, Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, senior advisor Jared Kushner and attorney Rudy Giuliani support the pardon for Milken.\nMilken has a net worth of $3.7 billion, according to Forbes. The financier, who pioneered the market for high-yield bonds while at Drexel Burnham Lambert, was sentenced to 10 years in prison and permanently banned from the securities industry by the Securities and Exchange Commission. His prison term was reduced to two years.\nThe White House and a spokesperson for the Milken Institute did not immediately respond to requests for comment.\nSee the full Bloomberg News report here."}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032657.txt_24670
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032657.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Darren Indykc", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "11/17/2017 6:34:33 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 16, 2017, at 3:46 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": ""}]
| 2
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022234.txt_24671
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022234.txt
|
Re: Jeffrey and Ghislaine: Notes on New York's Oddest Alliance
|
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Tue, March 8, 2011 3:27:58 PM", "subject": "Re: Jeffrey and Ghislaine: Notes on New York's Oddest Alliance", "body": "Jeffrey and Ghislaine: Notes on New York's Oddest Alliance \n<http://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/2on/o3/notes-on-new-yorks-oddest-couple-jeffrey-epstein-and-ghislaine-maxwell.html> \nby Vicky Ward <http://www.vanityfair.com/contributors/vicky-ward> \n\"I've got a story idea for you. The rebuilding of Indonesia. Or New Orleans. Or both. Go there. I've just been. \nYou will never think the same way about anything again.\" \nSo spoke not Bill or Melinda Gates, but Ghislaine Maxwell, the 48-year-old woman being written up \neverywhere at the moment as the alleged \"procurer\" of young women for billionaire Jeffrey Epstein. \nEpstein, 57, is the financier who spent a year in jail on charges of soliciting prostitutes—and now there is talk of \nanother investigation because various women, now in their twenties and thirties, have come forward with \nallegations that he molested them when they were under-age. The allegations first surfaced in British \nnewspapers, which have zeroed in on Epstein's friendship with Prince Andrew, who has recently tried to \npublicly disassociate himself from his old pal. \nI wrote a piece for Vanity Fair in 2003 called \"The Talented Mr. Epstein.\" It was largely a business piece that \nfocused on his mysterious exit from Bear Stearns in 1981, his close relationships with Jimmy Cayne, Les \nWexner, the chairman of Limited Brands, and above all, the man who claimed to be his mentor, Steven Jude \nHoffenberg, who is currently serving a 20-year-jail sentence for bilking investors in Towers Financial out of \n$450 million. \nThe piece alluded to Epstein's great friendship with Maxwell, and how she introduced him to young women \nwith whom he had sexual relationships. But, in the end, the story didn't really go there, focusing instead on the \nissue that remains a mystery—how Jeffrey made his money, and how Ghislaine made hers. \nThis is not to say I didn't hear stories about the girls. I did. But, not knowing quite who to believe, I \nconcentrated on the intriguing financial mystery instead. But now the women have come back. Not the same \nones, different ones. And their stories are bone-chilling. Journalists from England have phoned—and, in one \ncase, flown—to ask me about Epstein and Maxwell. Who is he? And the British, especially, want to know: Who \nis she? At this point, I am so bored of repeating myself to others—it was, after all, my 2003 Vanity Fairstory \nthat really brought him into the limelight—that I have decided to write about this myself. \nBizarrely, perhaps, I have gotten to know Jeffrey and Ghislaine far better after my piece than before it. I kept \nrunning into both of them, separately, at parties. Jeffrey is not a social animal so he usually has a couple of \nyoung women with him who stand two feet behind him, as if serving a monarch. \"Do they speak?\" I remember \n1 \nasking him once, nodding at his lookalike blondes. He laughed. \"Not like you,Vicky,\" was his riposte. \nI remembered that when we'd once discussed math—in particular, an isosceles triangle—and I revealed I hadn't \nstudied math since I was 14 (such is, or was, the way of the British educational system), I received a package at \nhome via messenger. It was a book: \"Math for idiots.\" \nSo he is not without humor, even though he doesn't drink or smoke, and hates restaurants. \n\"Jeffrey knows a good deal about most subjects,\" newspaper publisher Mort Zuckerman told me last week. He \nwas certainly preaching to the converted. The truth is, Epstein does know a lot about a lot of things. Just a few \nmoments in his company and you know this to be true. \nWhen I saw pictures of Prince Andrew walking in Central Park with Jeffrey, my immediate thought was that \n\"Andy\"—as Jeffrey calls him—is probably asking for help with his role as British trade envoy, or whatever his \nstrange title is. Because if one thing's for sure: When it comes to international business, Jeffrey knows what \nhe's talking about far more than \"Andy\" does. Which is why Leon Black, Mort Zuckerman and a few other \nfinanciers hang out with him. \nAnd Ghislaine? \nFull disclosure: I like her. Most people in New York do. It's almost impossible not to. \nShe is always the most interesting, the most vivacious, the most unusual person in any room. I've spent hours \ntalking to her about the third world at a bar until 2am. She is as passionate as she is knowledgeable. She is \ncurious. She has spent weeks at the bottom of the ocean, literally going deeper than anyone else. She has sent \nme a DVD of the fish there. Her rolodex would blow away almost anyone else's I can think of—probably even \nRupert Murdochs'. She is very well-read and can talk about most things for hours. She is passionate about Bill \nClinton with whom she is close friends. \nYet, touchingly, when she had to give a speech at the 40th birthday party of her best friend, Ariadne Calvo-\nPlatero, (known fondly to her close friends as \"the Tennis Goddess\") Ghislaine shook a little with nerves. When \nit comes down to things she really cares about—and Ariadne is one of them—Ghislaine shows her vulnerability. \nAnd that vulnerability is key to understanding her friendship with Jeffrey. \n\"He saved her,\" I remember a close friend of mine telling me. \"When her father died, she was a wreck; \ninconsolable. And then Jeffrey took her in. She's never forgotten that—and never will.\" \nIn many ways, the socially awkward Epstein with his big house, plane, island and ranch was the perfect \nreplacement for her father, the late Robert Maxwell, newspaper tycoon and criminal. Sure, Jeffrey had his \nsexual pecadillos, but then Ghislaine's father was not without his oddities. After all, it was he who died leaving \na massive \"black hole\" he'd fraudulently created. To Ghislaine, Jeffrey's habits may not have seemed that \nstrange. \nIn fact, she probably figured, rather like I have, after years of writing about he very rich, that most successful \npeople in the end either have some weird habit (the late Bruce Wasserstein had the weight issues, the girl \nissues, and moved countries to avoid paying tax), or they break the law (Sam Waksal, Martha Stewart.) You \ndon't tend to get to the top by being the world's most balanced human being. Even the folksy Warren Buffett \ndidn't quite manage a normal life—whatever that is. He had a second \"wife\" for many years whose existence he \nhas been open about. \nSo what to make of the current fuss over Ghislaine? I haven't spoken to her or to Jeffrey, but I suspect that her \nloyalty to friends like Bill Clinton will keep her in good stead, in the end, she'll be out and about as always. Look \nat Waksal and Stewart. No one sees them and thinks: criminal. Au contraire. In this city, money makes up for \nall sorts of blemishes."}, {"sender": "MOMMINNEMUMMIN", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, March 8, 2011 8:32 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "? Good for you. And ghislaine. congrats"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031680.txt_24673
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031680.txt
| null |
[{"sender": "J [[email protected]]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "12/13/2018 10:02:38 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Federal prosecutors are investigating whether U.S. President Donald Trump's inaugural\ncommittee misspent some of the funds it raised, the Wall Street Journal reported on\nThursday, citing people familiar with the matter.\n\nThe probe opened by the Manhattan U.S. attorney's office is examining whether some of the\ncommittee's donors gave money in exchange for policy concessions, influencing\nadministration positions or access to the incoming administration, the Journal said.\n\nRead Newsmax: WSJ: Federal Prosecutors Probing Trump Inauguration Spending\n\nUrgent: Do you approve of Pres. Trump’s job performance? Vote Here Now! --"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023454.txt_24678
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023454.txt
|
Re: The Edge Annual Question 2012 - Invitation (Confidential)
|
[{"sender": "John Brockman FST", "recipients": ["jeffrey epstein <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, December 15 2011 02:57 AM", "subject": "Re: The Edge Annual Question 2012 - Invitation (Confidential)", "body": "Keep it coming. JB"}, {"sender": "jeffrey epstein", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 14, 2011, at 3:47 PM", "subject": "Re: The Edge Annual Question 2012 - Invitation (Confidential)", "body": "Mathematics ideals are universal truths , biology is intrinsically based in deception . Predators in search of free energy , would be able to decipher and consume , if it weren't couched ina multi layered encrypted form . Even self deception acts as a defensive strategy. More later\n\nSorry for all the typos .Sent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "John Brockman", "recipients": ["Paul Allen, Jeff Bezos, Sergey Brin. Hubert Burda, Steve Case. John Doerr, Jeffrey Epstein, Tony Fadell, Bill Gates, Danny Hillis, Maja Hoffman, Bill Joy, Salar Kamangar, Dean Kamen, Vinod Khosla, Marissa Mayer, Kary Mullis Elon Musk, Nathan Myhrvold, Pierre Omidyar, Larry Page, Sean Parker, Jean Pigozzi, Nick Pritzker, Miuccia Prada, Eric Schmidt, Jacqui Safra, Ricardo Salinas Pilego, Charles Simonyi, Jeff Skoll, Craig Venter, Jimmy Wales, Evan Williams, Mark Zuckerberg"], "timestamp": "Dec 14, 2011, at 3:05 PM", "subject": "Re: The Edge Annual Question 2012 - Invitation to participate", "body": "In the summer of 2009, in a talk at the Bristol (UK) Festival of Ideas, Freeman Dyson articulated a vision for the future. He referenced \"The Age Of Wonder\", by Richard Holmes, in which the first Romantic Age described by Holmes was centered on chemistry and poetry, while Dyson pointed out that this new age is dominated by computational biology. Its leaders, he noted, include \"biology wizards\" Kary Mullis, Craig Venter, medical engineer Dean Kamen; and \"computer wizards\" Larry Page and Sergey Brin, and Charles Simonyi. He pointed out that the nexus for this intellectual activity — the Lunar Society for the 21st century — is centered around the activities of EDGE.\n\nDys"}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028940.txt_24689
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028940.txt
|
an article you may both hate. or like.
|
[{"sender": "Noam", "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "On Davis, I frankly think that’s a non-issue. If she decides she cannot do her job as the conditions of employment require (including following the law), then she can quit and look for another job. As in any other such case."}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Noam Chomsky", "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, September 10, 2015 1:51 AM", "subject": "an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "hope all is well.\n\nLawrence\n\nhttp://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/all-scientists-should-be-militant-atheists"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032389.txt_24692
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032389.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["[email protected]"], "timestamp": "12/7/2016 5:29:21 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yikes your birthday coming up next month"}, {"sender": "[email protected]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "12/7/2016 12:25:22 P.M. Eastern Standard Time", "subject": "Re:", "body": "plenty left"}, {"sender": "Jonathan Farkas EEE", "recipients": ["jeffrey"], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 1:01 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Hi jeffrey hope all is well | think you are going to have a winderful life from now on in your opinion how much is left in this\nmarket it's been a trump triumph | gave him some money through woody best jonathan\n\nSent from my iPhone"}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031694.txt_24700
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031694.txt
|
Fw: from Jesse Kornbluth
|
[{"sender": "Peggy Siegal", "recipients": ["Jefffrey Epstein [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "Sat, 30 Apr 2011 16:59:25 -0400", "subject": "Fw: from Jesse Kornbluth", "body": "Jesse Kornbluth could never make a dime. He is an angry loser who was married to Annette Tapert years ago.(She now is married to\nJoe Allen and they live near you in PB) Annette left him because there was no bread on the table and he is nasty.\n\nWhat should I do? Call him or not? Peg"}, {"sender": "Jesse Kornbluth", "recipients": ["Peggy Siegal", "Jesse Kornbluth"], "timestamp": "Sat Apr 30 16:29:18 2011", "subject": "Re: from Jesse Kornbluth", "body": "Peg --\n\nObviously, I'm sharing what follows on the assumption that everything here is just between us.\n\nThe thesis of the Times piece is that the rich and their corporations have SO much power\nthat we no longer live in a democracy.\n\nCan \"we the people\" make change? Not really.\nWho can? The rich and powerful.\nHuh? All they want is the status quo. Or more.\n\nBut they could --- okay, it's not likely, but they could --- turn on the bad actors at their social/economic level.\nFor example: Wall Street CEOs, donors to the Tea Party, etc.\n\nThat's the topic. Shaming. Shunning.\nOne of the people I deal with --- there are several others. --- is Jeffrey Epstein.\nReading the clips, I don't see that Jeffrey as been shunned.\n\nIn this piece --- http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2011-04-01/bill-clinton-katie-couric-woody-allen-jeffrey-epsteins-\nsociety-friends-close-ranks/ ---\n\nTread:\n\nThe crowd at the events top publicist Peggy Siegal has organized for Epstein proves the point, at least behind closed doors. \"I and\nmany others that know him describe him as brilliant,\" says Siegal.\n\n\"His unique mind is what attracts the world's smartest people to his home.\" Last September, with Siegal's help, Epstein hosted a Break\nFast after Yom Kippur. A group of 120 friends brought their children over for a buffet dinner\n\nThis was just a few months after he finished his prison obligations in Florida.\nAnd here he is, entertaining --- with children present."}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023440.txt_24703
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023440.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 5:15 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "lets see how you feel sunday"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 5:18 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Good advice."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 5:23 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I don't want to give up my apartment in NY."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 5:34 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "no need to. call eric and get a data point"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 5:35 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I will. The rent on the apartment is significantly more than the monthly salary."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 8:16 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "how much and who pays now?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 8:17 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I have so much more info to tell you on Sunday."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 8:32 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "decision :easier, harder, more complex?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 8:38 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Both harder and easier. He was there."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 8:46 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I assume that means harder to say no, ? easier to say yes. ."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 8:48 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Harder to say no for sure."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 8:52 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "try to get a good night sleep. see you sunday"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 9:58 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I will try."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Did you read David Brooks today?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "9/20/2014 5:29:55 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "He is a pseudo intellectual . Friendship is a complex biological process . Part altruism part cooperation , it does\nnot lead to genetic fitness , friends are not inherited with genes . Nick christophalos at kit has done much work .\nThat being said , I get your point"}]
| 15
|
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026652.txt_24705
|
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026652.txt
|
Fwd: Press: Heatstreat- ‘Shady’ Israeli Mogul Hires Ex-White House Counsel To Represent Employee Arrested in Inauguration Day Riot, Raising Questions
|
[{"sender": "Kathy Ruemm|cr", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "1/24/2017 4:21:55 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Press: Heatstreat- ‘Shady’ Israeli Mogul Hires Ex-White House Counsel To Represent Employee Arrested in Inauguration Day Riot, Raising Questions", "body": "Look at this craziness."}, {"sender": "Glick, Jamic (DC)", "recipients": ["Ruemmler, Kathy (DC)", "Kurlander, Stuart (DC)"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, Jan 24, 2017, 10:04 AM", "subject": "RE: Press: Heatstreat- ‘Shady’ Israeli Mogul Hires Ex-White House Counsel To Represent Employee Arrested in Inauguration Day Riot, Raising Questions", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Ruemmler, Kathy (DC)", "recipients": ["Glick, Jamie (DC)", "Kurlander, Stuart (DC)"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 24, 2017 10:24 AM", "subject": "RE: Press: Heatstreat- ‘Shady’ Israeli Mogul Hires Ex-White House Counsel To Represent Employee Arrested in Inauguration Day Riot, Raising Questions", "body": "Gotta love the conspiracy theorists"}, {"sender": "Zuieback, Jamie (DC)", "recipients": ["Ruemmler, Kathy (DC)"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, Jan 24, 2017, 10:37 AM", "subject": "RE: Press: Heatstreat- ‘Shady’ Israeli Mogul Hires Ex-White House Counsel To Represent Employee Arrested in Inauguration Day Riot, Raising Questions", "body": "I’m dying to hear about your weekend. I can’t take credit, but I heard someone say that you handling this was like asking your buddies if they had anyone who could fill in for a pick-up game, and somebody sends over LeBron."}]
| 4
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023326.txt_24709
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023326.txt
| null |
[{"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 8:56 PM", "subject": null, "body": "guess you wanted to save money. ?\nThe audit has brought to the fore the lack of your office quality that i have been violently squawking about. ie\n. children playing with works of art. . It is inconceivable to me that John castrucci is still there , joslin part\ntime, but relied on . joe error prone and brad a corporate bandleader talking about the office's finance team,\naccounting dept, and directing wendy to do things that are clearly not in your interest. ( saving money again\n?) its nuts!!.a still non-existent IT dept. impossible , it was the first thing on my list of things that were\nneeded to be done. Still no trading accounts to speak of , though its prophylactic quality has been discussed\nover and over during the past three years . computers do not read Page Six. the women atthe IRS do.! you\nsaid your motivation in keeping this group of part timers was a consequence of the high cost of my\nartwork. . the unfortunate result was easily predictable. - now\nIf you want my and my atelier to continue, I will oversee the audits. take charge of the TRA BRH\nassignments and review 2012 amendment options!!( note :your redo of the estate fire drill has not progressed\nvery far ). Lots of paper needs to be collected and reviewed, At MY direction. the outside team will be brought\nin at my expense working for me and you. coming in for interviews and reviews, . sucession, technology, tax\nand compliance. investment reporting , , computerized timelines for filings etc. . household\nclassifcations and reporting with a system of best practices.\n\nMy goal is clear - to end, not extend , our financial interactions. you will have a machine that works , it\nwill not be complexto oversee , to create it, is some thing else . Unfortunatley for us both, the price for my\nworks has not changed since day one. 40m per year, I m willing to discount it to 35 as I did give you a bad\number when asked and should pay an embarassment fine. Im also aware, as you made perfectly clear . that\nyou have already paid what you consider a great deal of money, for my work , but again its value exceeds\nanything else by far in your collection at a cost less than agreed upon. . please also remember that you andi\nagreed no more demands on my time after the last payment for the big transaction.\n\nOR, you can decide that brad , tom , and whomever else you choose can screw with my work and they can\noversee your audits. they are both aware and sensitive to the issue at hand. alan could be brought in but i\nwould be extra careful having paul weiss given access to entire story.\n\n_-On an unrelated note- you recently seemed shy to discuss certain things. , please be assured I make no\njudgement on any of your activities , whether or not i agree with them . not my role I am always on your side\non the table. I hope your personal life quiets. you ‘ve had a rough 15 months.\n\n3. Remind me to talk to you about MR"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "dec 2015", "subject": null, "body": "IT, still desperately needed- reporting flawed cumbersome and inaccurate . all done by hand as one -off\nexercises , - airplane: re structure, (my only suggested priority in june ) is really ,no further ahead, ,consultants\nup the kazoo but nothing at all done.( the office was told that i cannot even see the proposals received without\nbrads specific authorization ) - brad has no idea even as to what questions to ask. he knows little of finance, is\nrun roughshod over by almost everyone in the office. he is a little man , using your power, to appear larger .\nEileen was self aware enough to know she was over her head , that is a huge difference. bad info is\nrampant ie 3 million in deductions Im told are taken for art space but on closer examination it turns out\nthey cannot be used at all. ( ZERO benefit ) though you will be told yes they were deducted on the return they\nsaid that is the question they get asked ! \" were they deducted \"not -\"1is there a benefit\" !! I asked for the\nbalance sheet and P and L for Regan arts , a basic first step in order to check your financials. \"sorry we never\ngot one?\" though 9.8 million invested, no p&l, nothing , a construction project run amok , no budget, the coo\nfired after only 3 months. , no clue. I can add that artspace financials are also a total mess.\n\nAs your friend and in order toturn the page. I will try to be constructive\nThe following is alist of things I think would be in your interest to get done asap .but definitely not by me.\n\nisuggest you form new grats. , hire a high level tax partner. use your trading accounts as they remain"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032643.txt_24713
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032643.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "11/6/2017 9:07:51 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "this was just tweeted by famous saudi opposition @mujtahidd .. almost 2 million followers ..\n#Trump_ MBS scandal involving President @realDonaldTrump and Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman...\n\nFollowing @realDonaldTrump's visit to SA, US stance on Saudi affairs changed especially on competition\nbetween MBS & MBN and Qatar siege.\n\nMBS = Saudi Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman (de facto King)\nMBN = Mohammad bin Nayef (deposed Saudi Crown Prince and Interior Minister)\n\nPrior to @realDonaldTrump, US institutions stood firmly with MBN throughout Obama's presidency. This was\nreaffirmed in a letter to the King.\n\nAfter @realDonaldTrump's Riyadh visit, he changed the US stance on the MBS v MBN power struggle and\nforced the establishment to back MBS.\n\nPast US administrations were keen on avoiding strife within GCC: This is because American interests cannot be\nupheld without a harmonic GCC.\n\nThat was until @realDonaldTrump's return from Saudi upon which Qatar siege began and he openly supported\nit contradicting Defence&State Dept\n\nThat was until @realDonaldTrump's return from Saudi upon which Qatar siege began and he openly supported\nit contradicting Defence&State Dept\n\nMore bizarrely; MBS has a secure direct line to Trump like no other leader has - not even Israeli Netanyahu &\nBritish May...\n\nThe following story explains MBS's 'special' influence over @realDonaldTrump - even if it means\ncompromising America's national interests...\n\nDuring @realDonaldTrump's Riyadh visit in May 2017 a private yacht discreetly arrived at Jeddah Port; heavily\nguarded and identity hidden.\n\nEven the Port's authorities were not allowed near it. Only a number of individuals reached it - delivering several\nboxes of cash ($1bn USD).\n\nAfter loading the boxes, the yacht disappeared. The operation lasted hours & was kept secret as was yacht's\nidentity, origin and destination\n\nIt transpired from MBS's inner circles that the $1bn was from MBS himself & the yacht belonged indirectly to\n@Trump Organisation. #Trump_ MBS"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021729.txt_24718
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021729.txt
|
Fwd: Epstein prosecutor was rebuked for prior child sex case I Miami Herald
|
[{"sender": "Darren Indyke <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["[email protected]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 12:30 PM", "subject": "Epstein prosecutor was rebuked for prior child sex case 1Miami Herald", "body": "https://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/article226765309.html"}, {"sender": "J [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Martin Weinberg", "Darren Indyke", "Jack Goldberger"], "timestamp": "3/14/2019 4:48:11 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Epstein prosecutor was rebuked for prior child sex case I Miami Herald", "body": ""}]
| 2
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033195.txt_24720
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033195.txt
|
Trump University agrees to settle lawsuit for $25 million:
|
[{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "11/18/2016 8:37:36 PM", "subject": "Trump University agrees to settle lawsuit for $25 million:", "body": "Importance: High\nhttp://www.cnbc.com/2016/11/18/president-elect-donald-trump-nearing-settlement-in-trump-university-case-source.html"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030624.txt_24721
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030624.txt
|
Fwd: Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein
|
[{"sender": "Tonja Haddad Coleman", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]", "Debbie Fein"], "timestamp": "10/18/2013 10:38:16 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esq.\nSent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "Sharon Churcher", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "October 18, 2013 at 6:32:28 PM EDT", "subject": "Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Dear Sirs:\n\nWe are preparing an article about the calendaring today of Mr Edwards' claim against Mr Epstein for jury trial and the witness list which names Virginia Roberts and other young women who allege they were underage victims of Mr Epstein.\n\nMr Edwards claims that Mr Epstein maliciously attempted to intimidate him and his clients into retracting their claims.\n\nMs Roberts further has stated to us that she intends to testify that she was flown to London by Mr Epstein and instructed to have sex at age 17 with Prince Andrew. She alleges that she was paid $15k for this encounter.\n\nShe claims that on another occasion, Mr Epstein flew two young women to a dinner for the purpose of entertaining President Clinton. She claims she herself was sex trafficked to several other men, whose contact information is contained in an address book of Mr Epstein's filed in court records.\n\nMay we have a comment please? Our deadline is 1pm tomorrow (SATURDAY) ET.\n\nYours sincerely,\nSharon Churcher\nThe Mail on Sunday (New York office)\nPh:"}]
| 2
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020437.txt_24723
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020437.txt
|
Will Cohen Cooperate? Tenuous Finances May Provide Crucial Clues
|
[{"sender": "Richard Kahn [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "4/27/2018 8:25:30 PM", "subject": "Will Cohen Cooperate? Tenuous Finances May Provide Crucial Clues", "body": "shockingly it appears he has some money in real estate deals_"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033575.txt_24728
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033575.txt
| null |
[{"sender": "Tonja Haddad Coleman", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein", "Darren Indyke", "Debbie Fein", "Farmer Jaffe"], "timestamp": "5/13/2013 10:28:30 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Farmer Jaffe is suing Donald Trump!\n\nhttp://www.mypalmbeachpost.com/news/business/lawsuit-lobbed-against-trumps-ownership-of-former-\n/nXjjQ/?icmp=pbp_internallink_invitationbox_apr2013_pbpstubtomypbp_launch"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026233.txt_24741
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026233.txt
|
Re: TSA PBI
|
[{"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["[email protected]"], "timestamp": "11/21/2017 1:37:36 AM", "subject": "Re: TSA PBI", "body": "yes,,, that makes sense,\nok,., I'll re-positon to Boca on Saturday, ill make resv for departure for Dave and |,\n\nthx\nLarry"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Larry Visoski"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 20, 2017 8:29 pm", "subject": "Re: TSA PBI", "body": "might make more sense to reposition on sat to boca?"}, {"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["Jeffrey"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 7:23 PM", "subject": "Re: TSA PBI", "body": "While Trump is in PBI, TSA only allows arrival and departures between 8am and 5pm for General Aviation.\n| made a resv for Nov 26th at 8am to St Thomas,,\nPassengers: You and\n| can make passenger changes up to 24 Hours before Departure, they also request if we are traveling with an animal.,\nFYI,\nThey also ask if Passengers are Male or Female, strange, they didn’t ask names.\n\nThx\nLarry"}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022776.txt_24745
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022776.txt
|
Help!
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["[i rote"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 19, 2016", "subject": "Re: Help!", "body": "i appreciate it. I should be back feb 14,"}, {"sender": "[i rote", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 6:39 PM", "subject": "Re: Help!", "body": "Because you were not available to meet me in person last year and at this point I don’t need to be seen. I can not have press,\nmedia, private investigators, film companies, etc. contacting me or my parents and sisters at home or on cell/texts and or by\nmail. I realize you don’t have much control over this, but you can at least help me to move. I can’t just get up and go like you.\nI left the city to escape, make a better life and I am devastated these people found me and brought to light an association of that\nI would rather them never to know. People think I was involved with something really bad and I lost a boyfriend of great\npotential over this shit. I am still in debt over all these years, been working my ass off trying to get ahead, which you could\nnever understand I was even surviving off the pay I was getting. Well, its not any better. I dropped out of college because of\nyou (and GM’s) advice. Started working for a company you wanted me to and basically my life has has become hell since then."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["[i rote"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 20, 2016", "subject": "Re: Help!", "body": "i appreciate your support is what i meant. has anyting happened recently? it is my birthday today"}, {"sender": "[i rote", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 7:19 PM", "subject": "Re: Help!", "body": "Happy birthday, I remember the few I had spent with you, good memories!\n\nThe problem is that you may appreciate my support but that doesn't help me. Yes, I told you I can't have\npeople coming here to ask about you and ex pals.... My landlord may shoot them. He is pissed. I need your\nhelp. Out of all the people you should be helping is someone who actually genuinely cared about you.i realize\nyou're living the good life and I'm not your concern, but if you really appreciated my support then you'd help\nme otherwise I don't know what I'll do."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["[i rote"], "timestamp": "On Wednesday, January 20, 2016", "subject": "Re: Help!", "body": "what do you suggest?"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Friday, January 22, 2016 2:28 PM", "subject": "Help!", "body": "Since I need and at this point want to move off this breathtaking property, I want to be able to buy a home in\nNJ, with $0 savings, = impossible. With salary and cost of living, I don't get ahead. Also my luck with men and\nrelying on a man for support is the worst idea. Average homes in NJ are $400-$500K ugh I also still have to pay\noff student loan, ($9,809.74)."}]
| 6
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033213.txt_24752
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033213.txt
|
Peter Thiel, Trump’s Tech Pal, Explains Himself - NYTimes.com
|
[{"sender": "Richard Kahn [i", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "1/11/2017 11:38:08 PM", "subject": "Peter Thiel, Trump’s Tech Pal, Explains Himself - NYTimes.com", "body": "https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/01/11/fashion/peter-thiel-donald-trump-silicon-valley-technology-\ngawker.html?referer=http://www.drudgereport.com/"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025215.txt_24755
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025215.txt
|
Eye on the Market, July 25, 2011
|
[{"sender": "[email protected]", "recipients": ["Undisclosed recipients"], "timestamp": "7/25/2011 4:33:45 PM", "subject": "Eye on the Market, July 25, 2011", "body": "Eye on the Market, July 25, 2011 (the attached PDF document is much easier to read)\n\nTopics: US debt ceiling negotiations, a more ambitious European bailout plan (finally), and how large cap growth stocks and rising corporate profits are patiently waiting for both of them to end\n\nWhite Castle. Twenty five years ago, I had a friend with a peculiar way of responding to seeing things he didn’t like on TV: he would throw White Castle hamburgers at the screen. I always thought this was a bad way to waste a good hamburger, but I had one of those moments the other night when watching news reports on debt ceiling discussions. Media outlets have referred to President Reagan’s scolding of Congressional Republicans for delaying debt ceiling increases, and the 18 increases that took place during his Presidency. The implication: reservations about raising the debt ceiling are as irresponsible now as they were then. This is a disingenuous argument; in the 1980’s, the debt ceiling being debated was 50% of GDP, and had no bearing on the solvency of the United States. Today, the proposed increase raises the debt limit twice as high, measured relative to GDP or government revenues. While a default is a very bad idea (deserving of a White Castle hurling of its own), unconstrained debt growth with no plan to slow it is bad as well. Some suggest we not worry about debt growth, since demand from foreign central banks and the Federal Reserve would keep yields in check. That logic is irresponsible at best. Debt limit legislation is a rocky but healthy way for a democracy to decide whether mega-deficits are in the long-term public interest. \n\nOver the last few days, the Gang of Six plan, the Reid-McConnell plan and the Obama-Boehner plan have all been raised up the flagpole and then lowered. By the end of the process, we’re still looking for deficit reduction of $3 trillion+ over 10 years (relative to the CBO Alternative case in which there is no deficit reduction at all). However, Congress is running short on time, and may have to do a smaller debt ceiling increase/deficit reduction first. For now, we wait to see the balance of spending cuts and revenue increases will be agreed to. Last week’s Profiles in Courage piece walked through the history and dynamics of this process, so we won’t repeat that here. Here’s our take on what has been proposed so far, with the caveat that many plans are not crystal clear what baseline they are using, or what steps they recommend to get to that baseline first. For example: the Gang of Six state that they used the President’s budget as a baseline (scored by CBO in March 2011), reduced deficits by $3.7 trillion, and ended up with a 71% debt/GDP ratio; but they do not explain how they get to the President’s baseline in the first place.\n\nI have a feeling that revenue increases will be a material (e.g., 25% or more) part of the deal. The Peterson Foundation’s sampling of 6 policy groups shown below indicate that 5 of 6 recommend revenue increases compared to where we are today; the Heritage Foundation’s “Woody Guthrie Memorial Budget Plan” is the only exception. What kind of revenue increases? Raising the top two brackets, which would affect joint filers with adjusted gross incomes above $212,300, would raise $450-$700 billion over 10 years (depending on whether you use OMB or CBO numbers). If they cannot agree to raise rates, another option (as in the Gang of Six plan) would be reductions in the deductibility of state and local taxes, sales taxes, mortgage interest, etc. As this gets sorted out, let’s hope everyone recognizes that the US tax system is already progressive. As shown in the chart below, effective Federal tax rates for low earners have dropped to zero over the last decade, even after including FICA taxes. News reports that the US tax system is regressive make me want to throw hamburgers at the screen.\n\nEurope: Finally (!!), but now what?\n\nFor the first time since 2009, it felt last week like European policymakers were trying to get out in front of things. In exchange for a modest amount of “private sector involvement”, Germany agreed to more generous financing terms for Greece, Ireland and Portugal, and an expanded role for the EU-IMF lending facility (see following page). What would the plan accomplish if implemented? While Greek debt to GDP ratios would remain well over 125% of GDP (the IMF estimate for next year is a ridiculous 170%), Greece’s near-term financing obligations would decline, due to debt buybacks, exchanges into long maturity bonds, and interest grace periods on new EU loans. More broadly, the plan also allows for money to be lent to countries before they enter into an IMF program, for recapitalization of banks. All things considered, it’s the broadest defense of the Monetary Union so far. On paper, it even looks like a free ride for holders of Greek paper that don’t participate in the debt exchanges (they would be paid at par). So, what’s not to like? Well, there are still questions about Greece:\n\n** There’s a big difference between generous financing terms and generous economic terms. Greece must still meet an enormous 5%-6% primary budget surplus target (government revenues less spending, pre-interest) during a recession\n\n** Greece must execute on its asset sale targets, despite having little success or experience doing this in the past \n\n** Banks listed in the IIF document (the committee representing them) are under no binding legal obligation to participate in the debt exchanges, and may turn out to own less Greek debt than currently believed. [Note: bank participation in the Latin Brady bond era was high, since at the time, banks held almost all the paper, and in the form of illiquid loans].\n\nThe big question: would Germany still live up to the deal if Greece missed deficit targets or assets sales, if bank participation was too low, or if hedge funds (once referred to by the Chairman of the German Social Democratic Party as a “swarm of locusts”) reaped large free rider windfalls? Ultimately, this is a political question. If “yes”, Germany will underwrite Greece no matter what; if “no”, then a broader, coercive Greek restructuring might follow in the not-so-distant future.\n\nIn addition to execution risk in Greece, we are left with 3 other concerns. The current EU-IMF lending facility capacity is Eur 255 bn, but we anticipate that as agreed, national parliaments will expand it to 440 bn. First concern: while that’s to deal with problems in Greece, Portugal and Ireland, if you include Spain, it gets tight (note: the chart excludes costs to recapitalize banks). If Italy or Belgium entered Europe’s Liquidity Hospital, a lot more money might be needed from European parliaments (in one worst-case scenario, Alliance Bernstein estimates that the EU lending facility would have to increase from 440 bn to 1.7 trillion Euros, mostly from Germany). Italy faces a multi-notch downgrade from Moody’s, which is not going to help. As we discussed two weeks ago, Italy has been a model citizen in terms of running low budget deficits for 20 years, but still cannot escape the confines of its very large existing debt stock (120% of GDP). \n\nSecond, as shown below, Europe is now a two-speed economy, with the periphery stuck in neutral (industrial production is one proxy for this; there are others, such as unemployment, consumption, export shares, etc). If the idea behind the EU/IMF effort is that austerity will boost growth and lead these countries back to the public markets, there is very little momentum in this direction. If the status quo in the periphery does not change, all the EU package does is allow the current approach more time to fail. \n\nThe third concern: Germany as paymaster. We are often told that Germans across both major parties are unflinching supporters of the European project, and will do whatever it takes to prevent a break-up. The objections from members of the Bundesbank are described as lonely voices of opposition that carry no weight [a]. But how large are the costs going to be? German politicians and voters may see current circumstances as exceptional, and that if they just agree to one more package, the problem will go away. However, we are starting to see analyses of how costly a permanent transfer union may be for Germany. Bernard Connolly at Hamiltonian Advisors sent me a recent paper from the Centrum fur Europaische Politik in Freiburg, which provides some clues. They see three alternatives for the deficit countries: \n\n** massive reduction in regulations and unit labor costs to regain competitiveness\n\n** exit from the EMU, re-introduction of national currencies\n\n** permanent transfer union from surplus countries to deficit ones\n\nOn the last option, they estimate a “creditworthiness gap” in European deficit countries of Eur 108 billion in 2010. The gap measures how much European deficit countries rely on capital inflows to fund consumption, rather than investment (which contributes to future GDP). Germany’s share of the European surplus is around ¾, so let’s assume a pro-rata burden on Germany to maintain the transfer union. As a result, the theoretical economic cost could be 3.3% of German GDP every year, which as shown, gets close to some expensive episodes in German history. If German citizens were faced with costs this high, it could be a White Castle hamburger-throwing moment of national proportions.\n\nBottom line. At a time when European equities are trading close to 2009 lows relative to earnings and book value, this package could result in a relief rally for European equities, particularly banks. The chance of a disorderly default in 2011 has decreased markedly, and a process has been put in place to create more seamless transfers to areas (and banks) in need. But the size of the transfer union fund is not big enough to allay all concerns, particularly with Spain and Italy growing at anemic levels, and there is execution risk in Greece. \n\nRecent bank stress tests conducted by the EU concluded that only Eur 2.5 billion of capital needs to be raised (70 to 80 billion sounds more reasonable to us). And in the package announced last week, the following Orwellian clause indicates how European policymakers feel about rating agencies these days: \n\nPoint 15. We agree that reliance on external credit ratings in the EU regulatory framework should be reduced, taking into account the Commission's recent proposals in that direction, and we look forward to the Commission proposals on credit ratings agencies\n\nIn Europe, denial appears to be an essential ingredient to the process (See “Five Stages of Greece”, June 30, 2011). Last week’s package is a bold step towards Federalization and the worst-case outcomes have been avoided (money market failures, bank runs, etc), but markets will remain nervous about Europe.\n\nWhile we’re waiting: large cap growth stocks\n\nOne day, the melodramas around US and European sovereign debt will end. While we’re waiting, one of the asset classes that looks attractive is large cap growth stocks. As shown below (for a universe of 300 U.S. large cap growth stocks that meet certain earnings quality and stability factors), free cash flow relative to both revenues and stock prices looks good compared to the last four decades. This is where we believe investors should be adding exposure if they are underweight versus their desired equity allocations. This is also an asset class where active management can still provide a lot of value; the dispersion of large cap growth managers is higher than large cap core, large cap value and international equity manager dispersion.\n\nQ2 earnings season in the US is off to a good start. Nearly 30% of the S&P has reported, and results have generally been positive. Earnings are beating consensus estimates by almost 4% (7.4% ex-financials), all ten sectors are beating on revenue targets, and only 7% of companies are reporting below-consensus earnings. Given earnings expectations for 2011 at $98.50, the S&P 500 is trading at a reasonable 13.5x forward multiple. However, y/y earnings growth expectations appear to be flattening out for both 2011 and 2012 at around 11%-12%. While Q2 earnings are doing well so far, some company guidance for the remainder of the year has been below consensus, which would be consistent with the recent batch of reports indicating a slowdown in manufacturing and service sector surveys.\n\nMichael Cembalest\n\nChief Investment Officer"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033207.txt_24760
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033207.txt
|
Trump Tells Tech Chiefs He Will Foster Innovation - The Wall Street Journal.
|
[{"sender": "David Fisze", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "12/15/2016 8:37:33 AM", "subject": "Trump Tells Tech Chiefs He Will Foster Innovation - The Wall Street Journal.", "body": "This is pretty cool, Palantir was the only private company invited to yesterday's tech summit. That seems like a huge change post election and bigger oppty. Let's hang in PB.\n\nI thought you would be interested in the following story from The Wall Street Journal.\nTrump Tells Tech Chiefs He Will Foster Innovation\n\nhttp://www.wsj.com/articles/top-tech-execs-to-meet-trump-to-talk-jobs-regulations-148 1724004\n\nDownload the Wall Street Journal app here: WSJ."}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019105.txt_24764
|
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019105.txt
|
Fwd: Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE
JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!
|
[{"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "8/17/2016 3:27:07 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE\n\nJEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!", "body": ""}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028968.txt_24766
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028968.txt
|
RE: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein
|
[{"sender": "Roy Black", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "Alan M. Dershowitz Re. Jack Goldberger PCs"], "timestamp": "4/28/2016 4:47:41 PM", "subject": "RE: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Privileged - Redacted"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Alan M. Dershowitz", "Roy Black", "Jack Goldberger"], "timestamp": "Thursday, April 28, 2016 12:39 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Martin Weinberg", "recipients": ["Jeff Epstein <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:20 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Privileged - Redacted\nLoin aieiiie RATS N eR iN Te emia R aii mN Ri RRR OR iN Ta Rees eaie ater eieNeTereeA il"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "April 28, 2016 at 12:14:37 PM EDT", "subject": "RE: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Sorry, the suit is attached to this email."}, {"sender": "Ingram, David (Reuters News)", "recipients": ["‘Martin G. Weinberg’"], "timestamp": "Thursday, April 28, 2016 12:14 PM", "subject": "Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Hi Marty,\n\nThe attached lawsuit was filed this week in federal court in California alleging that Jeffrey Epstein and another man, Donald Trump, raped her in 1994. We’re planning to publish a story on the suit this afternoon, and we want to make sure it is fair. Is Mr. Epstein available to speak? Or do you want to offer a comment on this behalf?\n\nMy number is] and I’m available any time. I also just tried your cell phone.\n\nThank you in advance.\n\nDavid Ingram"}]
| 5
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030618.txt_24769
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030618.txt
|
Re: Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein
|
[{"sender": "Sharon Churcher", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "October 18, 2013 at 6:32:28 PM EDT", "subject": "Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Dear Sirs:\n\nWe are preparing an article about the calendaring today of Mr Edwards' claim against Mr Epstein for jury trial and the witness list which names________________and other young women who allege they were underage victims of Mr Epstein.\n\nMr Edwards claims that Mr Epstein maliciously attempted to intimidate him and his clients into retracting their claims.\n\nMs further has stated to us that she intends to testify that she was flown to London by Mr Epstein and instructed to have sex at age 17 with Prince Andrew. She alleges that she was paid $15k for this encounter.\n\nShe claims that on another occasion, Mr Epstein flew two young women to a dinner for the purpose of entertaining President Clinton. She claims she herself was sex trafficked to several other men, whose contact information is contained in an address book of Mr Epstein's filed in court records.\n\nMay we have a comment please? Our deadline is 1pm tomorrow (SATURDAY) ET.\n\nYours sincerely,\nSharon Churcher\nThe Mail on Sunday (New York office)\nPh: or"}, {"sender": "Tonja Haddad Coleman", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Oct 18, 2013, at 6:38 PM", "subject": "Re: Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Fred Haddad", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Oct 18, 2013, at 8:10 PM", "subject": "Re: Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Fred Haddad", "Tonja Haddad Coleman", "Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]", "Debbie Fein"], "timestamp": "10/19/2013 12:27:41 AM", "subject": "Re: Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}]
| 4
|
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011281.txt_24771
|
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011281.txt
|
Financials: buy XLF call spreads
|
[{"sender": "Ens, Amanda", "recipients": ["jeffrey E.", "Rich Kahn"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, November 22, 2016 2:15 PM", "subject": "Financials: buy XLF call spreads", "body": "Underweight positioning, buybacks resuming, positive momentum and strong fundamentals all indicate that there is still further upside potential in financials (more details below). Our financials sector specialist thinks XLF could have another 20-25% upside given the many levers to the Trump Trade: less regulation, higher interest rates, higher vol, economic growth, loan growth, etc. The asset sensitive regional banks are more of a pure play on a rates move but we view the larger cap banks as having multi-pronged upside given the aforementioned points.\n\nThat said, given the velocity and magnitude of the recent move and uncertainty around the impact and timing of Trump’s policies, we believe options offer better risk-reward than being outright long financials stocks here. With flat call skew, “appearing” call spreads with upside knock-ins price well.\n\nBuy a 1 year XLF call spread for 2.6% premium\n\ne Buyai110% call\n\ne = Sell a 117.5% call with an at-expiry knock-in at 125% (call is not active unless XLF is 125% or higher at expiry)\no Total premium is 2.6%\n\no Gross max payoff if knock-in is triggered: 2.9x (7.5%/2.6%)\n\no Gross max payoff if knock-in is not triggered: 5.7x (14.9%/2.6%) — you have upside up to 124.9%\n\nPost Election Flow Skews - Buyers of Health Care (via ETFs) and Financials (mainly ETFs)\ne US Buyback Flows\n\ne Cons Disc, Technology and Financials are the largest 3 sectors for US buybacks (over 70% of execution). We are seeing a seasonal increase in buybacks as we come out of the low seasonal month of the year (October) and should see increased buyback executions until year-end, another source of upside for the Cons Disc, Technology and Financials sectors.\n\nGlobal Positioning, Nigel Tupper, 11/14. Large long-only funds are more underweight Financials than any other sector and are UW this sector in all regions.\n\nFuture of Financials conference hosted 90 public and private companies at our Future of Financials conference. We are raising our price objectives across most of our names. Three primary reasons why we think there is upside remaining"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033561.txt_24773
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033561.txt
|
Fwd: Why Palm Beach, Florida Is The 'New Greenwich' For Wall Streeters
|
[{"sender": "SC", "recipients": ["[email protected]"], "timestamp": "1/21/2014 10:51:27 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Why Palm Beach, Florida Is The 'New Greenwich' For Wall Streeters", "body": "aiataetal Original Message-----"}, {"sender": "BRYAN SUBOTNICK", "recipients": ["Subotnick Stuart (MM)", "prosperi paul"], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 21, 2014 4:35 pm", "subject": "why Palm Beach, Florida Is The 'New Greenwich’ For Wall Streeters", "body": "FINANCE\n\nwhy Palm Beach, Florida Is The \"New Greenwich’ For wall Streeters\n\nJACQUELINE DETWILER, DUJOUR\nJAN. 21, 2014, 1:18 PM\n\nNeilson Barnard/Getty Images\nThe Palm Beach finance crowd can paddleboard whenever they please.\n\nBehind a semicircular brick drive and a lawn as manicured as a putting green sits a 30,000-square-foot\nmasterpiece of Italian Renaissance architecture called Casa Nana.\n\nJohn Porter, a real estate associate for Corcoran who oversees some of the largest sales in Palm Beach\nCounty, Florida, points out the spiral staircase, built by famed 1920s architect Addison Mizner for the\nfounder of the National Tea Company. “This home went for $30.2 million in 2003; today that sum wouldn’t\nbe in the top 25 highest prices” of houses for sale in this area, Porter says. “Palm Beach real estate\nhas gone from nothing going on to nothing left to sell.”\n\nPorter is giving me a tour of the so-called Billionaire’s Row, a stretch of South Ocean Boulevard on the\nisland of Palm Beach that is bordered by some of the highest hedges I’ve ever seen. Through gaps in the\ngreenery appear stone fountains, elephant statues, pools the size of tennis complexes (next to actual\ntennis complexes), and more clay roofs than one could count. It’s a monumental display of wealth, and it\nis rapidly expanding, not just here but in Delray Beach, Jupiter, Palm Beach Gardens and Boca Raton, as\nmoney pours out of the Northeast Cand in some cases, from as far as London and Singapore) and into this\nalready wealthy section of southeast Florida. Approximately 70 hedge and private equity funds are now\nheadquartered here, many of which have set up shop in the last two years, jacking up home prices and\nspurring a countywide initiative to become, as some have said, “the new Greenwich.”\n\nFor hedge fund managers who might normally be inclined toward Westchester or Connecticut, the allure of\nSouth Florida is as plain as grits on toast. The homes are sprawling; the Intracoastal waterway is a\nyachter’s paradise. It has a glittering social scene. During high season—October through March-there\nmight be several fundraisers on any given night. Perhaps the key factor, however: In Florida, there are\nno individual income taxes, no estate taxes and no capital gains taxes. A hedge fund manager reporting $1\nmillion in income can expect to pay only the federal government, whereas his counterpart living in\nConnecticut pays that plus an extra $67,000. And if the poor schmuck were still in New York City? He’d\nbetter be ready to fork over $104,300.\n\nAs for why all of this is happening now, when Florida has long been a sunny tax haven, so to speak,\nfinanciers point to the upcoming application of Section 457A of the Internal Revenue Code. Before 457A\nwas enacted, certain fees and related earnings could grow tax deferred in offshore accounts for up to ten\nyears. But now, according to the section, hedge fund managers will need to funnel all of the fees that\nwere deferred before 2009 and their related earnings back into the U.S. by 2017. If a manager lives in"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030987.txt_24784
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030987.txt
|
FYI
|
[{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "2/1/2019 4:07:11 PM", "subject": "FYI", "body": "Books and newspaper accounts of Trump’s 45 years in business were full of his\nshady dealings, and the presidency had only helped to highlight them and to surface even\njuicier ones. Real estate was the world's favorite money laundering currency and Trump's\nB-level real estate business was quite explicitly designed to appeal to money launderers.\nWhat’s more, Trump’s own financial woes, and desperate efforts to maintain billionaire\nlifestyle, cache, and market viability, forced him into constant and unsubtle\nschemes. Practically speaking, you couldn’t miss him, as the Mueller investigation\nappeared to be finding.\n\nIn November 2004, for instance, Jeffrey Epstein, the financier later caught in a scandal\ninvolving under-age prostitutes, agreed to buy out of bankruptcy a house in Palm Beach,\nFlorida for $30 million—a house that had been on the market for two years. Epstein and\nTrump had been close friends—playboys in arms, as it were—for more than a decade,\nwith Epstein often counseling Trump on his chaotic financial affairs. Epstein took Trump\nto see the Palm Beach house to advise him on construction issues involved with moving a\nswimming pool. As he prepared to finalize his deal for the house, an incredulous Epstein\nsaw a severely cash-constrained Trump bid $41 million for the property, buying it through\nan entity called Trump Properties LLC, financed by Deutsche Bank. Trump, Epstein knew,\nhad been renting his name, telling Epstein he ought to do the same—that is, for an ample\nfee, Trump was willing to serve as a front man to disguise the actual ownership in a real\nestate transaction. (This was, in effect, just another variation of Trump’s basic business\nmodel of licensing his name for commercial properties owned by someone else.) A furious\nEpstein, suspecting that the real owner was a Russian oligarch, who Trump Knew, Dmitry\nRybolovlev—part of the close Putin circle of government-aligned industrialists in Russia—\nthreatened to expose the deal, then getting extensive scrutiny in Florida papers. The fight\nbecame all the more bitter when, two months later, the house was put on the market for\n$125 million. Well known to Trump, who often saw Epstein at his current Palm Beach\nhouse, Epstein was visited almost every day, and had been for many years, by girls who he\npaid for massages with happy endings—girls recruited from local restaurants, strip clubs,\nand, also, Trump’s Mar-a-Lago. Just as the threats and enmity of the two friends increased\nover the house sale, Epstein found himself under investigation by local Palm Beach police.\nEpstein’s legal problems vastly escalated as the house, with only minor improvements,\nwas bought for $96 million by Dmitry Rybolovlev. That is, Trump had either miraculously\nearned $55 million, without putting up a dime, or Rybolovlev, or someone such as\nRybolovlev, paid Trump Properties, LLC—actual owner unknown—$96 million, thereby\nproviding a clean payment of $55 million to someone. Rybolovlev might have, in effect,\npaid himself for the house, thereby cleansing the money. Epstein, on his part, would spend\n12 months in jail on a prostitution charge."}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031441.txt_24786
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031441.txt
|
Fwd: High Profile
|
[{"sender": "Fresno ee on behalf of Christina Galbraith", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "1/5/2015 10:12:19 PM", "subject": "Fwd: High Profile", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jamie Rosenwald", "recipients": ["[email protected]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 5:07 PM", "subject": "High Profile", "body": "Dear Jeff,\n\nYour name popped up again in the Press and I thought it was time to congratulate you on your wonderful\nfinancial successes since your days as my Physics prof at Dalton!! The young, bright options trader, who\nunderstood Black Sholes and how to use it, at Bear, made good!!\n\nUnless your PR advisor is Donald Trump, I am not sure that current press provides you with much benefit.\nPerhaps I am wrong? Not the first time!!\n\nAnyway, middle age has brought its own unique set of challenges. Aging certainly ain’t for sissy’s.\n\nRegards,\nPs. David Asch and I toasted to you during our Thanksgiving weekend in Amagansett in November."}]
| 2
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033426.txt_24796
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033426.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Keyu Jin", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "December 22, 2018 at 12:49:20 AM EST", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I also wanted to say how grateful I am and have been for your support, and also your support of my father's work. I don't say these things often enough but it is I hope implied."}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 7:03 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Sent 45 minutes after she sent an outline.\nI had sent a comment in mtg w her father flattering her father and saying other China officials had flattered him as well."}, {"sender": "J <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 22, 2018, at 7:18 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "trump - borderline insane. dersh, a few feet further from the border but not by much"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["J [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "12/22/2018 12:52:50 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Of course. Who knows whether I'm serious? Not at this moment me.\nWill trump crack into insanity?"}]
| 4
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030397.txt_24797
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030397.txt
| null |
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Brad S Karp"], "timestamp": "12/14/2017 9:31:07 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Importance: High \nhttp://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031089.txt_24801
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031089.txt
|
Special tax benefits could help founders and investors
|
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Faith Kates"], "timestamp": "10/28/2010 4:16:11 PM", "subject": "Special tax benefits could help founders and investors", "body": "Special tax benefits could help founders and investors\nby Craig Sherman and Andrew Bryant on Tuesday, October 26, 2010, 9:10am PDT\nCraig Sherman and Andrew Bryant: A little noticed provision of a recently enacted federal tax law may lead\nto a significant increase in the formation of new startups and angel investing before the end of this year. If you\nhave been thinking about founding or investing in a technology startup, there is no better time to jump in and\ntake advantage of a recently enacted federal income tax benefit.\nPresident Obama recently signed into law changes to tax law that may, under certain circumstances, exempt\nprofits from investments in startup companies from ALL federal income tax, including alternative minimum\ntax. Yes, that's right, if you start a new company now and sell it more than five years from now and make a $10\nmillion profit on the sale, you may owe NO federal income taxes on your profit.\nThis special tax benefit will apply only to stock issued to founders or investors between September 28 and\nDecember 31, 2010, so time is of the essence.\nThe founder or investor would have to buy and hold shares of a \"qualified small business\" for five or more\nyears. A \"qualified small business\" is a C corporation engaged in an active trade or business with less than $50\nmillion in aggregate gross assets.\nIf you satisfy the above requirements and certain other conditions, you may not have to pay federal income\ntaxes on your first $10 million of gain. If there is a liquidity event within five years of your purchase of\nqualified small business stock, you may still be eligible to \"roll over\" any gains from sale of the shares tax-free\nwithin 60 days into another qualified small business."}]
| 1
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033340.txt_24806
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033340.txt
|
Trump-Deutsche Bank links in sights of U.S. House investigators
|
[{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "1/18/2019 3:13:37 PM", "subject": "Trump-Deutsche Bank links in sights of U.S. House investigators", "body": "https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-deutsche-bank/trump-deutsche-bank-links-in-sights-of-u-s-house-investigators-idUSKCN1PC123"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030470.txt_24807
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030470.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "3/8/11 3:47 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Jeffrey and Ghislaine: Notes on New York's Oddest Alliance\nhttp://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/2011/03/notes-on-new-yorks-oddest-couple-jeffrey-epstein-and-ghislaine-maxwell.html\n\nby Vicky Ward http://www.vanityfair.com/contributors/vicky-ward\nMarch 8, 2011, 2:30 PM\n\n“I’ve got a story idea for you. The rebuilding of Indonesia. Or New Orleans. Or both. Go there. I’ve just been.\nYou will never think the same way about anything again.”\n\nSo spoke not Bill or Melinda Gates, but Ghislaine Maxwell, the 48-year-old woman being written up\neverywhere at the moment as the alleged “procurer” of young women for billionaire Jeffrey Epstein.\n\nEpstein, 57, is the financier who spent a year in jail on charges of soliciting prostitutes—and now there is talk of\nanother investigation because various women, now in their twenties and thirties, have come forward with\nallegations that he molested them when they were under-age. The allegations first surfaced in British\nnewspapers, which have zeroed in on Epstein’s friendship with Prince Andrew, who has recently tried to\npublicly disassociate himself from his old pal.\n\nI wrote a piece for Vanity Fair in 2003 called “The Talented Mr. Epstein.” It was largely a business piece that\nfocused on his mysterious exit from Bear Stearns in 1981, his close relationships with Jimmy Cayne, Les\nWexner, the chairman of Limited Brands, and above all, the man who claimed to be his mentor, Steven Jude\nHoffenberg, who is currently serving a 20-year-jail sentence for bilking investors in Towers Financial out of\n$450 million.\n\nThe piece alluded to Epstein’s great friendship with Maxwell, and how she introduced him to young women\nwith whom he had sexual relationships. But, in the end, the story didn’t really go there, focusing instead on the\nissue that remains a mystery—how Jeffrey made his money, and how Ghislaine made hers.\n\nThis is not to say I didn’t hear stories about the girls. I did. But, not knowing quite who to believe, I\nconcentrated on the intriguing financial mystery instead. But now the women have come back. Not the same\nones, different ones. And their stories are bone-chilling. Journalists from England have phoned—and, in one\ncase, flown—to ask me about Epstein and Maxwell. Who is he? And the British, especially, want to know: Who\nis she? At this point, I am so bored of repeating myself to others—it was, after all, my 2003 Vanity Fairstory\nthat really brought him into the limelight—that I have decided to write about this myself.\n\nBizarrely, perhaps, I have gotten to know Jeffrey and Ghislaine far better after my piece than before it. I kept\nrunning into both of them, separately, at parties. Jeffrey is not a social animal so he usually has a couple of\nyoung women with him who stand two feet behind him, as if serving a monarch. “Do they speak?” I remember\nasking him once, nodding at his lookalike blondes. He laughed. “Not like you, Vicky,” was his riposte.\n\nI remembered that when we'd once discussed math—in particular, an isosceles triangle—and I revealed I hadn’t\nstudied math since I was 14 (such is, or was, the way of the British educational system), I received a package at\n\nhome via messenger. It was a book: “Math for idiots.”\n\nSo he is not without humor, even though he doesn’t drink or smoke, and hates restaurants."}, {"sender": "Jean Luc Brune", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "3/8/2011 9:08:46 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "This is not bad"}]
| 2
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025942.txt_24809
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025942.txt
|
RE: Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Noam Chomsky"], "timestamp": "Saturday, June 25, 2016 8:23 AM", "subject": "RE: Re: ", "body": "now where?"}, {"sender": "Noam Chomsky", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "Saturday, June 25, 2016 11:51 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Got back a few days ago. Right now at the Cape for a few days. After that Valeria is off to Brazil and I'll be in Cambridge until she comes back."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Noam Chomsky"], "timestamp": "Saturday, June 25, 2016 11:54 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "what was the highlight.? caribean is close to brazil, if you wanted you are always welcome and valeria can meet you there."}, {"sender": "Noam Chomsky", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 8:59 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "Highlight? A chance to spend some free time alone together. Some good concerts. An evening in a small café with jazz duo playing Brazilian jazz. Things like that.\nStill eager to make it to the Caribbean, but looks as though we'll have to wait."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Noam Chomsky"], "timestamp": "Sunday, June 26, 2016 6:20 AM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "brexit. trump. Syria , ukraine. all tribal"}, {"sender": "Noam Chomsky", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "6/27/2016 12:23:53 PM", "subject": "RE: Re: ", "body": "All too true, I'm afraid."}]
| 6
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031327.txt_24810
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031327.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Gmax [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["[email protected]"], "timestamp": "5/18/2011 11:27:04 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Gmax"], "timestamp": "Wed May 18 06:37:36 2011", "subject": "Re:", "body": "do you have photos from our clinton trip to africa"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032496.txt_24811
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032496.txt
|
Re: update
|
[{"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "2/17/2017 8:34:47 PM", "subject": "Re: update", "body": ""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 17, 2017, at 3:26 PM", "subject": "Re: update", "body": ""}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031333.txt_24813
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031333.txt
|
The European Union Times
|
[{"sender": "ee", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "6/18/2011 2:51:44 PM", "subject": "The European Union Times", "body": "Russia Says IMF Chief Jailed For Discovering All US Gold is\nGone\n\nA new report prepared for Prime Minister Putin by the Federal Security Service (FSB) says that former\nInternational Monetary Fund (IMF) Chief Dominique Strauss-Kahn was charged and jailed in the US for sex\ncrimes on May 14th after his discovery that all of the gold held in the United States Bullion Depository located\nat Fort Knox was ‘missing and / or unaccounted’ for.\n\nAccording to this FSB secret report, Strauss-Kahn had become “increasingly concerned” earlier this month\nafter the United States began “stalling” its pledged delivery to the IMF of 191.3 tons of gold agreed to under\nthe Second Amendment of the Articles of Agreement signed by the Executive Board in April 1978 that were to\nbe sold to fund what are called Special Drawing Rights (SDRs) as an alternative to what are called reserve\ncurrencies.\n\nThis FSB report further states that upon Strauss-Kahn raising his concerns with American government officials\nclose to President Obama he was ‘contacted’ by ‘rogue elements’ within the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)\nwho providedhim ‘firm evidence’ that all of the gold reported to be held by the US ‘was gone’.\n\nUpon Strauss-Kahn receiving the CIA evidence, this report continues, he made immediate arrangements to\nleave the US for Paris, but when contacted by agents working for France’s General Directorate for External\nSecurity (DGSE) that American authorities were seeking his capture he fled to New York City’s JFK airport\nfollowing these agents directive not to take his cell-phone because US police could track his exact location.\nOnce Strauss-Kahn was safely boarded on an Air France flight to Paris, however, this FSB report says he made\na ‘fatal mistake’ by calling the hotel from a phone on the plane and asking them to forwarded the cell-phone\nhe had been told to leave behind to his French residence, after which US agents were able to track and\napprehend him.\n\nWithin the past fortnight, this report continues, Strauss-Kahn reached out to his close friend and top Egyptian\nbanker Mahmoud Abdel Salam Omar to retrieve from the US the evidence given to him by the CIA. Omar,\nhowever, and exactly like Strauss-Kahn before him, was charged yesterday by the US with a sex crime against\na luxury hotel maid, a charge the FSB labels as ‘beyond belief’ due to Omar being 74-years-old and a devout\nMuslim."}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026287.txt_24816
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026287.txt
|
Re: Hello
|
[{"sender": "David Schoen", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <[email protected]>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 9:54 PM", "subject": "Re: Hello", "body": "Just checking in to see how you are getting along these days. I hope all the litigation is well behind you and things are going well\nTake care.\nDavid"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["David Schoen"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, July 4, 2018", "subject": "Re: Hello", "body": "judge jeannie?"}, {"sender": "David Schoen", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 7:51 AM", "subject": "Re: Hello", "body": "I am obsessed with prosecutorial and FBI misconduct wherever it rears it ugly head and i am committed to doing what i\ncan to fight it whether for my death penalty clients or a klansman. Lots of wrongdoing here and we all lose when the\nsystem breaks down.\nI assume you were just flipping the channels.\nHope you are doing well. I see they never miss an opportunity to try to drag you in - saw an article the other day asking\nhow you missed the #metoo press and tying you to trump. Didn't mention much of all you have been put through\nalready. I hope the cases are all behind you now. I would have liked to have helped; but i guess you and your team\ndecided on a different direction. Whatever works best."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["David Schoen"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jul 4, 2018 8:10 am", "subject": "Re: Hello", "body": "is it overblown. ? all mob prosecutors have strong feelings towards their targets. I recall many that told stories of\nhow they despised gotti etc. why is stryok different ?"}, {"sender": "David Schoen", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 8:31 AM", "subject": "Re: Hello", "body": "Gotti was an anomaly because of his personality (some agents loved him and some hated him); but I get your\npoint. Couple of things:\n1. This the investigation of the President. It is only as good as public confidence in it can be (subtracting the conspiracy\ntheorists on both sides). We just can't have someone with this kind of political bias as a lead investigator. But more\nimportantly, he was not alone. He was just stupid enough to show it in office emails. We don't yet know what his private\nemails showed. Strzok, however, says that he met with McCabe - the number 2 guy in the FBI - and in his office\ndiscussed how best to stop Trump from becoming President. That just cannot be tolerated. Plus, if I find any evidence\nof personal or other extraneous animus in any case by any agent or prosecutor, I view it as an open invitation for cross\nexamination and any other exploitation possible as it cannot be an accepted part of the process.\n2. In this whole matter, I am most disturbed by the composition of the Mueller team and it seems to me that if we are to\nlearn anything from the IG's report it is the importance of having an investigation conducted above-board without\npersonal and political baggage. Mueller had a whole universe of lawyers from around the country to choose from to\nmake up his team. He purposefully chose a murderer's row of the worst. I can go one by one; but I will spare you. Here\nare a couple of examples:\nA. Andrew Weissmann was known in the EDNY as \"The Pathological Liar\" after the SNL character. He literally would\nwithhold exculpatory evidence throughout the case and then one day when defense counsel went to the bathroom or\nlunch, stick the documents under others on his table and tell the judge the lawyer had it all along. I have been brought\ninto a case in which he lied from start to finish - and now his rats have come to me to admit their role in it - to get murder\nconvictions in two cases. He has been cited by judges for his misconduct and he runined both Arthur Anderson and\nEnron through his work, all of which was rejected by the higher courts. He also is a Trump hater and Clinton\nsycophant. Mueller knows Weissmann's conduct up close and personal. He chose Weissmann for his chief counsel at\nthe FBI years ago.\nB. Jeannie Rhee, hand-picked by Mueller from Mueller's own firm, was actually Clinton's lawyer in the email\ninvestigation. Now how does that look. She also is a bully and thinks she is a real tough guy and I don't want that kind\nof character around. I also have an ineffective assistance of counsel case against her for a client in a $100 million\nearnings management fraud case in which she was way over her head.\nC. Greg Andres was another bully who replaced Weissmann in the EDNY. He withheld evidence terribly in his cases,\nregularly threatened others, and accused a defendant of putting out a contract on him when he knew it was a completely\nbogus claim, but gave him the publicity he craved. He is 100% in the pro-Clinton, anti-Trump camp. President Obama\ngave his wife a federal judgeship on the SDNY\nand on and on.\nI don't personally believe Russia affected the election at all; but I certainly am not qualified to say. I do know that we\nhave meddled in other countries' elections as a matter of policy forever. But the bottom line is, if there is to be an\ninvestigation, just play it straight up. I am friends for a long time with the IG. If they had picked him to head up the team,\nI would not be a weekly guest on Hannity tv and radio (I never would have been asked), as I know he would pick a team\nof honest folks from across the spectrum."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["David Schoen"], "timestamp": "On Wednesday, July 4, 2018", "subject": "Re: Hello", "body": "we're on the same team. strzok. testimony was that discussions with lovers , often include embellishments.\nand not indicative of non professionalism. I believe he said nothing more than it referenced\" andys\noffice\". . paige says andy was there. how many other people were there ? were strzok and paige. off in the\ncorner talking to each other. was mccabe on the phone? you know that taking emails alone is not\nmeaningful. . isnt it a but much to say that prosecutors that have strong opinions . should be looked out with\nskepticism? who doesnt have bias. . strzok had many neg hillary opinions. . - michael cohen. michael\nflynn.. are not fictions created by mueller ? how are you ?"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["[email protected]"], "timestamp": "7/4/2018 1:23:17 PM", "subject": "Re: Hello", "body": "By the way, your friend dershowitz is in hog heaven. He gets on every talk show on this issue, then he writes a\npiece about his friends now hate him, and today the Times has a piece about him writing a piece about how his\nfriends hate him. He might just be the Kim Kardashian of the legal scene."}]
| 7
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033354.txt_24819
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033354.txt
|
NYTimes: Decade in the Red: Trump Tax Figures Show Over $1 Billion in Business Losses
|
[{"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "5/7/2019 11:53:10 PM", "subject": "NYTimes: Decade in the Red: Trump Tax Figures Show Over $1 Billion in Business Losses", "body": "Here's a link from The New York Times that I thought you'd find interesting: \nNewly obtained tax information reveals that from 1985 to 1994, Donald J. Trump's businesses were in far \nbleaker condition than was previously known. \nSee More... \nGet The New York Times on your mobile device \nSent from my iPhone"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030464.txt_24821
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030464.txt
|
RE: Jeffrey and Ghislaine: Notes on New York's Oddest Alliance
|
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell, Paralegal"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, March 08, 2011 3:42 PM", "subject": "RE: Jeffrey and Ghislaine: Notes on New York's Oddest Alliance", "body": "Jeffrey and Ghislaine: Notes on New York's Oddest Alliance\n<http://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/2011/03/notes-on-new-yorks-oddest-couple-jeffrey-epstein-and-ghislaine-maxwell.html>\n\nby Vicky Ward <http://www.vanityfair.com/contributors/vicky-ward>\nMarch 8, 2011, 2:30 PM\n\n“I’ve got a story idea for you. The rebuilding of Indonesia. Or New Orleans. Or both. Go there. I’ve just been.\nYou will never think the same way about anything again.”\n\nSo spoke not Bill or Melinda Gates, but Ghislaine Maxwell, the 48-year-old woman being written up\neverywhere at the moment as the alleged “procurer” of young women for billionaire Jeffrey Epstein.\n\nEpstein, 57, is the financier who spent a year in jail on charges of soliciting prostitutes—and now there is talk of\nanother investigation because various women, now in their twenties and thirties, have come forward with\nallegations that he molested them when they were under-age. The allegations first surfaced in British\nnewspapers, which have zeroed in on Epstein’s friendship with Prince Andrew, who has recently tried to\npublicly disassociate himself from his old pal.\n\nI wrote a piece for Vanity Fair in 2003 called “The Talented Mr. Epstein.” It was largely a business piece that\nfocused on his mysterious exit from Bear Stearns in 1981, his close relationships with Jimmy Cayne, Les\nWexner, the chairman of Limited Brands, and above all, the man who claimed to be his mentor, Steven Jude\nHoffenberg, who is currently serving a 20-year-jail sentence for bilking investors in Towers Financial out of\n$450 million."}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell, Paralegal", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "3/8/2011 8:49:29 PM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "That’s actually a very well written article, and I suspect very true and from the heart.\nI was thinking about you today and all the BS....\n\nHow are you holding up??\n\nDid you see the comments on Lambiet’s Page re: Spencer ©"}]
| 2
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030383.txt_24822
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030383.txt
| null |
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <[email protected]>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Saturday, September 24 2016 01:26 PM", "subject": null, "body": "you can also add, fresh politcal juice by stating that Clinton was never on the island. I never met Al gore. no diiners on the island with either , no matter how much detail has been in the press. in fact boies Gores attny, knows that byt continues to represent the fabricator, the girl who claimed prince andrew had sex with her also accused stephen hawking and marvin minsky, . ? ehud barak on a gulfstream with five secruity guards looking the other way. ? all ludcrous."}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022977.txt_24843
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022977.txt
|
[{"sender": "paul krassner", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [[email protected]]"], "timestamp": "5/5/2017 3:19:21 PM", "subject": "", "body": "I ONLY FORWARD THIS SO YORE AWARE OF ITS EXISTENCE--pk\ni only forward this link so you're aware of its existence..."}]
| 1
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.