Raise system1_score floor to 3.0 when dominant pattern is gap-consequence enumeration

rater.py

@@ -192,6 +192,10 @@ Guide:
 4.0 = strong System 1 signal
 5.0 = dominant System 1 reasoning
 
+Scoring constraint:
+If Issue Prioritization <= 1 AND the dominant pattern is gap-identification with consequence labels rather than causal or methodological reasoning chains explaining how the gap undermines the paper's core claims,
+then system1_score should be AT LEAST 3.0, because flat enumeration of gap-consequence pairs is itself a System 1 heuristic pattern — it reflects the enumeration heuristic rather than analytical decomposition.
+
 ### 5.2 system2_score
 Definition:
 How strongly the passage reflects slow, explicit, analytical, evidence-based, decomposed, and rebuttable reasoning.